Re: [Lsr] [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Feb 17, 2021, 7:30 AM -0800, Christian Hopps , wrote: > Hi LSR and TEAS, > > This begins a joint WG last call for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/ > > Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3, >

Re: [Lsr] RFC 8919, RFC 8920, Flex Algo, and Flex Algo BW Constraints

we are going in rounds, +1 Les! Cheers, Jeff >> On Aug 18, 2021, at 1:20 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) >> wrote: >> >> Ron - >> >> Indeed – it is long past the time when we should be focusing on the “big >> picture”. >> I think Acee has stated it as succinctly as anyone – let me repeat for

Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification"

Number of BGP peers isn’t representative here, classical deployments would have a number of RR’s to circumvent full mesh. What counts is the total number of PEs (next-hops) that originate the prefix that is locally imported (needs to be tracked). For further optimization, only multihomed

Re: [Lsr] "Prefix Unreachable Announcement" and "IS-IS and OSPF Extension for Event Notification"

> On Oct 13, 2021, at 12:04, Peter Psenak wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > >> On 13/10/2021 19:28, Jeff Tantsura wrote: >> Number of BGP peers isn’t representative here, classical deployments would >> have a number of RR’s to circumvent full mesh. What counts is the tota

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call fo "IS-IS Flood Reflection" -draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-05

I’d very much support applicability draft work! Cheers, Jeff > On Jan 3, 2022, at 08:05, Tony Przygienda wrote: > >  > AFAIS this is a "operational and deployment" or "applicability" draft and not > part of a protocol specification. But yes, such a draft would have value > AFAIS, especially

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call fo "IS-IS Flood Reflection" -draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-05

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Nov 22, 2021, at 14:47, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > >  > This begins the WG Last for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-05. Please > post your support or objection to this list by 12:00 AM UTC on Dec 14th , > 2021. Also please post your comments on the

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Fast Flooding" - draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00

Acee, I support the adoption, and would like to thank the authors for the great work. At this point in time, it feels like experimental track is more suitable. Cheers, Jeff > > >> On Nov 22, 2021, at 6:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) >> wrote: >> >> We indicated the intent to adopt of >>

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt

+1 Les. Cheers, Jeff > > >> On 13/07/2021 17:39, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: >> Draft authors - >> I note that the new version has altered the advertisement of the Generic >> Metric sub-TLV so that it is no longer supported in the ASLA sub-TLV. >> This is in direct violation of RFC

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Jan 27, 2022, at 09:08, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > >  > LSR WG, > > This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your > support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on February 11th, > 20222. Also, review comments

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-liu-lsr-mpls-inspection-msd-01.txt

+1 Tony > On Aug 29, 2023, at 7:18 AM, Tony Li wrote: > > > Hi Eduard, > > I know several different products that use different silicon on different > line cards, ending up with different capabilities on different interfaces. > > This is more of a hardware issue than a software one. > >

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Aug 18, 2023, at 17:27, Christian Hopps wrote: > >  > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Sep 1, 2023, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-fox-lsr-ospf-terminology-01

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Apr 25, 2022, at 06:51, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fox-lsr-ospf-terminology/ > > Please indicate your support or objections by May 9th,

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] IGP Monitoring Protocol

Speaking as RTGWG chair: Robert - I don’t think we’d have enough time to accommodate a good discussion during IETF114 (we got only 1 slot), however would be happy to provide a platform for an interim. The topic is important and personally (being a very large BGP-LS user) I’d like to see it

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] IGP Monitoring Protocol

. Would be great to  do some study around existing solutions, see what worked, what didn’t’ (and why)   Cheers,Jeff From: Susan HaresSent: Saturday, July 9, 2022 1:44 PMTo: Jeff Tantsura; Robert RaszukCc: Acee Lindem (acee); lsr; i...@ietf.org; g...@ietf.org g...@ietf.orgSubject: RE: [Idr] [Lsr] IGP

Re: [Lsr] Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding

I’d support publishing it as Experimental. If there’s a consensus that an additional presentation in RTGWG would be useful, Yingzhen and I would consider it. Cheers, Jeff > On Jun 13, 2022, at 12:17, Acee Lindem (acee) > wrote: > > Hi Tony, Les, Tom, > > When the WG was focused on this

Re: [Lsr] Comments ondraft-gong-lsr-exclusive-link-for-flex-algo

+1 Cheers,Jeff From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 9:05 AMTo: 龚立艳; lsr@ietf.org; shraddhaSubject: Re: [Lsr] Comments ondraft-gong-lsr-exclusive-link-for-flex-algo Liyan – You agree that there is an existing way to prune links from the IGP SPF.Still, you insist that an

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ppsenak-lsr-rfc8920bis-02

Chris, I’m not aware of any IPR that hasn’t been disclosed and support the progress (as co-author). Cheers, Jeff > On Aug 8, 2022, at 05:57, John E Drake > wrote: > > Support > > Yours Irrespectively, > > John > > > Juniper Business Use Only > >> -Original Message- >> From:

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-00

Chris, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft and as a co-author support its progress. Cheers,Jeff From: Christian HoppsSent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 6:07 AMTo: lsr@ietf.orgCc: cho...@chopps.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920...@ietf.orgSubject: [Lsr]

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Optimal Distributed Flooding for Dense Topologies" - draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03

Yes/support Cheers,JeffOn Nov 23, 2022, at 07:50, Tony Przygienda wrote:as co-author support adoption. draft is a derivation of well-known MANET techniques used before successfully. The twists improving it (balancing of flooding across downstream nodes in addition to reduction) has been used in

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-01

Yes/support Cheers,JeffOn Mar 17, 2023, at 21:23, Gyan Mishra wrote:Support adoption ThanksGyanOn Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:09 AM Acee Lindem wrote: The begins the LSR WG adoption call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms Reverse Affinity Constraint" -

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

I agree with all aforementioned comments. Wrt AI/ML networking - if a controller is used, what is required is link state exposure northbound and not link state protocol in the fabric. (I could argue for RIFT though ;-)) I’d urge you to take a look at Meta’s deployment in their ML clusters

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-xu-lsr-flooding-reduction-in-clos-01.txt

sr-dynamic-floodingWhile I am a BGP person I feel pretty strongly that BGP is not a best fit for the vast majority of DC fabrics in use today. Cheers,RobertOn Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:49 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com> wrote:I agree with all aforementioned comments. Wrt

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

Hey Acee, Yes/support, valuable addition. Thanks, Jeff > On Feb 19, 2024, at 14:25, Acee Lindem wrote: > > > This starts the Working Group Last call for > draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07. At least some of the flex algorithm > enhancements described in the document have been implemented.

<    1   2