Acee, I support the adoption, and would like to thank the authors for the great work. At this point in time, it feels like experimental track is more suitable.
Cheers, Jeff > > >> On Nov 22, 2021, at 6:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We indicated the intent to adopt of >> draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00 as an LSR WG document at >> the IETF 112 LSR WG meeting. >> We are now confirming WG consensus on this action. Please indicate your >> support or objection on this list by 12:00 AM UTC on December 7th, 2021. >> >> Another question that came to light is whether the document should be >> standards track or experimental. If you have an opinion on this matter, >> please chime in along with your arguments for one track or the other. We >> probably won’t make a final decision on this now but let’s get the >> discussion started. >> >> Here is a link for your convenience: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/ >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
