Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16

Support as co-author. Note that the substantive changes to the document were to remove the unused ERO types - which was a widely supported change. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 7:03 AM > To:

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Secretary

Bravo! Now LSR is a world class WG. Thanx to Yingzhen for taking on this additional responsibility. Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 6:43 AM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Secretary All, I’m delighted to

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt

This just updates/corrects some references which was necessary as some of the referenced content moved into a different draft. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 9:42 AM > To:

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for Flex Algorithm Drafts

Support. I am open to combining into one draft so long as the authors feel comfortable that they can easily minimize the protocol specific text. Les From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:44 AM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] LSR

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt

are asking about. Les From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chund...@huawei.com> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 3:28 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> Cc: lsr@

Re: [Lsr] IPR Call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Les From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 12:39 PM To: draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810...@ietf.org Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: IPR Call for "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions" - draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

Re: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04.txt

a different flooding topology from the one IGPs use today is required or we will have accomplished nothing. Les From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2018 10:44 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> Cc: lsr@ietf.org; R

Re: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04.txt

I think this discussion has already gone much too far in the direction of customized flooding optimizations. Such is the nature of the engineering mind – give us a problem to solve and we’ll come up with a plethora of solutions. The right perspective (for me anyway) is this: IGPs have been

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt

orward way to identify the scope of the content from the name - just using "-lsr-" for all documents is very sub-optimal - and the fix for this is very easy. Les > -Original Message- > From: t.petch <ie...@btconnect.com> > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 3:43 AM &

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt

Chris - > -Original Message- > From: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:32 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> > Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Ver

Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt

-rfc7810bis” ?? Les From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 1:58 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Tony Li <tony...@tony.li>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] FW: New Version

Re: [Lsr] Inconsistence regarding the definition of "Adj-SID Sub-TLV" between OSPF and ISIS extension for Segment Routing

A strong +1 from me as well. This is a clear example where the functional content is the same, but differences exist in the encoding for reasons which are specific to each protocol. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Peter Psenak (ppsenak) >

[Lsr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt

:33 PM To: Qin Wu <sunse...@huawei.com>; David Ward (wardd) <wa...@cisco.com>; Spencer Giacolone <spencer.giacal...@gmail.com>; Spencer Giacalone <spencer.giacal...@gmail.com>; John Drake <ldr...@juniper.net>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Dav

Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7810 (5293)

I also believe the Errata should be accepted as is. This will make IS-IS consistent with OSPF (RFC 7471) as well as the related BGP-LS draft (draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp). Given there is evidence that implementations have differed in their interpretations it seems important to note that we may

<    4   5   6   7   8   9