Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

I support. - Naiming From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 20:26 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" -

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

Support the adoption of the draft. Regards, - Naiming > On Feb 11, 2019, at 2:44 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02. > > The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a >

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Sorry, someone reminded me that there is an IPR related to using the draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext scheme, https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2736/ thanks. - Naiming On Dec 17, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Naiming Shen (naiming) mailto:naim...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, I am not aware of any IPR a

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Hi, I am not aware of any IPR applies to draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext. thanks. - Naiming On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote: Authors, Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-17.txt

Hi, Thanks for Benjamin and Spencer’s good comments, we have update the new version to reflect that. Please review. Best Regards, - Naiming > On Dec 3, 2018, at 5:36 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. >

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Support as a co-author. thanks. - Naiming On Dec 1, 2018, at 4:54 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote: This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in this space. However, as WG

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-15

Hi Stewart, Thanks for detailed review and comments, please see some replies inline. the modified version diff is attached, please reivew. thanks. - Naiming Title: Diff: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-15.txt - draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-15-rev.txt  

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-15.txt

Corrected a misspelled name. > On Oct 16, 2018, at 3:39 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. > >Title : IS-IS

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-14.txt

Hi, a new version of reverse-metric draft is updated for addressing the comments from Barry and Eric. Regards, - Naiming > On Oct 16, 2018, at 3:18 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-13

Hi Barry, Thanks for the review and your suggestion makes sense. The original wording is confusing. Also, as Tony has pointed out in the same thread, this sentence was the original intention when start of the draft, but it has been extended for other use cases described in section 1. How about

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-06.txt

l. Best Regards, - Naiming --- tony On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:30 PM Naiming Shen (naiming) mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: Hi LSR’er, A new version of spine-leaf is-is draft is posted. The main change is adding a new bit from ‘link-attribute’ sub-tlv to indicate there is no need

Re: [Lsr] LSR Flooding Reduction Drafts - Moving Forward

e long term solution. Dean From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Naiming Shen (naiming) Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 12:19 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) mailto:ginsberg=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>> Cc: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Jeff Tantsura mailto:jefft

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-12.txt

Hi LSRers, A new version of reverse metric draft is posted, to add the text for new registry for sub-TLV in this document. Please review. thanks. - Naiming > On Aug 21, 2018, at 10:05 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line

Re: [Lsr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-10

I’m not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, - Naiming > On Jun 18, 2018, at 3:31 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Hi Authors, > > Can you please respond (including the mailing list) indicating if you are > aware of any IPR relating to draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric? > > Thanks,

[Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-06.txt

Hi LSR’er, A new version of spine-leaf is-is draft is posted. The main change is adding a new bit from ‘link-attribute’ sub-tlv to indicate there is no need to flood out on this interface, used by the spine nodes and for the case where the spine nodes are part of the dynamic flooding domain.