> Inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
> > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:17 AM
> > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Barry Leiba
> >
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
> > lsr@ietf.o
Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Has Issues
Only some minor things here:
— Section 3 —
Although modern implementations have not strictly adhered to the 33
millisecond interval, it is commonplace for implementations to limit
the flooding rate to the same order of magnitude similar
Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Has Nits
I understand why it’s easier to do a single document with a batch update, but I
question whether anyone will pay attention to it. Still, until the relevant
documents are organically replaced and these changes are actually folded into
them
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Thanks, Padma... the new paragraph now seems completely clear to me!
Thanks for the work on this.
Barry
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:03 AM Padma Pillay-Esnault
wrote:
>
> Hi Barry
>
> Thank you for your review
>
> See below PPE for my comments
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
of your
> points.
>
> More inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker
> > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 10:06 AM
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306...@ietf.org; Uma Chunduri
> > ; aretana.i...@gmail.c
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
. If you've thought about it and there's nothing, that's
OK.
Thanks for considering it.
Barry
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:01 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
>
> Barry -
>
> Thanx for the review.
> Response inline.
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Barry L
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
it advertises a Reverse Metric TLV toward a
> neighbor
>only to the operational maintenance window period during which it wants
> that
>neighbor to temporarily update its IS-IS metric or Traffic Engineering
> parameters
>towards it.
>
> Best Regards,
&
Reviewer: Barry Leiba
Review result: Ready
This document is well written and seems ready to go. The only security issue I
thought of as I read through it (attacking by spoofing a reverse metric) is
covered in the Security Considerations section.
I found one sentence to be slightly ambiguous
14 matches
Mail list logo
