[Lsr] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01

Tony: This change is wonderful. Thank you for your patience regarding my response. Sue From: Tony Li On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 11:06 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; lsr Subject: Re: Opsdir

[Lsr] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01

Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Has Nits Type of review: OPS-DIR Editorial comments: none Process comments: Normally, it is useful to give some advice to the designated experts for the specific registry. RFC5029 gives sufficient advice, but the document does not point backward tward

[Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-13

Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready The document is written in a clear and concise manner. The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject clear and readable. Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of IS-IS with dense flooding (section

[Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-03

Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready This is a routing directorate review. Just like other directorate review, it should be considered as part of the last call comments by the authors, the WG shepherd, and the AD. Status: no editorial or textual comments. The changes from "master-

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)

Support. This matches the IS-IS SRv6 extensions, and it is ready to publish. Sue From: Lsr On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy) Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:22 AM To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] IGP Monitoring Protocol

potential non-BGP solutions is outside of the scope of IDR. [IDR-chair hat off] [rtgwg WG member] I’d love to attend an interim on this topic. Sue Hares From: Jeff Tantsura Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2022 3:40 PM To: Robert Raszuk Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) ; lsr ; i...@ietf.org; Susan Hares ; g

Re: [Lsr] Request 5-10 minutes

: Thursday, June 30, 2022 12:54 PM To: Susan Hares ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request 5-10 minutes We will reserve time on the agenda for this since it is important. However, I’d hope we (the LSR chairs) would be involved as well. Thanks, Acee

Re: [Lsr] Request 5-10 minutes

Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 12:37 PM To: Susan Hares ; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request 5-10 minutes Note that to the best of my knowledge, the LSR chairs have not agreed to these slides so I must assume the agreement is amongst the IDR chairs?

[Lsr] Request 5-10 minutes

The IDR chairs wish to request 5-7 minute time slot to present IDR chair agreement with LSR chairs on BGP-LS TLVs in LSR WG drafts. Cheers, Sue Hares ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

Take questions at LSR or IDR. Cheers, Sue Hares From: Lsr On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 9:29 AM To: Tony Przygienda ; Ketan Talaulikar Cc: Jordan Head ; i...@ietf.org; lsr Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20) Tony P

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

To: Ketan Talaulikar Cc: Jordan Head ; Susan Hares ; i...@ietf.org; lsr Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20) hey Ketan, since as you know ;-) BGP-LS is not really IGP 1:1 translation we try to put into BGP-LS here only the stuff that is strictly

Re: [Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospv3-srv6-extensions

the OSPFv3 document moved forward quickly. Thanks, Sue From: Lizhenbin Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 10:20 AM To: Susan Hares ; lsr Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions Subject: RE: [Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospv3-srv6-extensions Hi Sue, Sorry for the late response. Thanks very

[Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospv3-srv6-extensions

What is the status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions? Is this draft ready for WG LC? Do you anticipate WG LC soon? This draft expired on 5/23/2022. It has not be updated since 5/23. Is this just an oversight for the authors? draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-09 references draft-ietf-lsr

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

suggested he had one. Cheers, Sue From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 8:52 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant); Susan Hares; Stephane Litkowski (slitkows); i...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org Subject

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] WG Adoption for draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Adoption call 1 week to allow discussion of that the revision that contains that information. Cheerily, Susan Hares From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 6:58 PM To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant); Susan Hares; '

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-06

I support adoption on experimental track. Sue Hares -Original Message- From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2020 4:12 PM To: Christian Hopps; lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG adoption

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] 答复: New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-ospf-ifit-node-capability-02

+1 to Acee Comments from IDR co-chair. We are trying to make life easier for you-all. Thanks, Sue -Original Message- From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 2:18 PM To: wangyali; lsr@ietf.org Cc: IDR List Subject: Re: [I

Re: [Lsr] 答复: LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

MT topology which specific rules for hierarchical MT-ISIS. Are you suggesting an standard MT topology be defined for hierarchical ISIS? Susan Hares From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aijun Wang Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 5:29 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: lsr@ietf.org

Re: [Lsr] 答复: LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Ajun: I’ll let Tony provide his answer to your question. Let me provide an alternate topology that your example might fit into draft-hares-lsr-grid-ring-convergence-00.txt describes a problem with IGP convergenc

Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

Support. Susan Hares From: Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem Date: Monday, August 12, 2019 at 5:58 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01 This begins a two week LSR Wo

Re: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

KetanYep.  That's the mechanism.  Was there another question?SueSent via the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" Date: 7/26/19 11:54 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Susan Hares , "Acee Lindem (acee

Re: [Lsr] Regd covering BGP-LS extensions for IGP ELC drafts

Ketan and Acee: The IDR co-chairs (John and I) wish to reduce the number of trivial drafts for BGP-LS allocations that could be done with 1 sentence. We discussed with the LSR chairs (Acee and Chris) that it would be reasonable for LSR to do what Ketan has requested. We suggest that t

Re: [Lsr] 回复： Status of draft-ietf-isis-encapsulation-cap

Xiaohu: The draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-12 is in a WG review of the final changes until June 7th. After this the draft will be sent to the IESG. You may want to review this final draft. Cheerily, Sue From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ???(??) Sent: Sunday, April

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

Acee: Support. Important for SRV6 dataplane. IDR draft has adopted draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-06. Sue PS - It past May 25th at 2019, but I did not see an announcement yet. From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019

Re: [Lsr] *** SPAM ***Re: When to augment LSR base YANG modules...

Rob and Acee: My apologies- I missed a vital typo. --- We can review info/data, and code functionality based on the key capability. I’ve revised the text inline below. Sue From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 10:14

Re: [Lsr] When to augment LSR base YANG modules...

Rob and Acee: I agree that with Rob that it is a generic problem that you must have a robust way to version and revise the Yang models. This is true for configuration, operational data, and dynamic data stores. The netmod modeling is focusing on configuration at this time. It is

[Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Discussion - a naive question

In working through the emails on the flooding reduction concepts, I have a few question: Is this work is simply for the spine-leaf topologies or for multiple topologies? . Does this work consider all of the following networks: spine-leaf data centers, 802.1 Provider Bridging, IPRAN topologies,

Re: [Lsr] [Idr] Signalling ERLD (ISIS, OSPF and BGP-LS)

Stephane, Gunter, Ketan, Les, and Jeff: Are you going to settle on option 2? Will we be seeing drafts with this change in this revision? Sue Hares -Original Message- From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 6:05