[Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
I support the adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. Thanks, Shuo Yan Comcast ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
I support adoption. It solve a real life problem in a more elegant way than other comparable work does. Also it is backwards comparable which makes it an easier conversation with customers. Thanks, Melchior > Op 6 jun. 2020 om 02:12 heeft Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang > het volgende geschreven: > > > Support the author’s request for adoption. > > Jeffrey > > > Juniper Business Use Only > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:04 PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG > document > > At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting > use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy > is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. While we would > love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an interoperable solution > between vendors it will be the customer reality that will drive deployment > and ultimately what runs in their networks. > > thanks > > --- tony > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
I Support WG adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01. This new ISIS flood reflection extension similar to BGP route reflection scalability concept, provides a valuable feature to optimize many L1/L2 adjacencies for very large contiguous L2 domains that span L1 areas. Gyan On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 8:12 PM Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote: > Support the author’s request for adoption. > > > > Jeffrey > > > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > *From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of * Tony Przygienda > *Sent:* Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:04 PM > *To:* lsr@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 > > > > *[External Email. Be cautious of content]* > > > > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rw1hQXbYkcBVgIhCsV-fUUskQePI13qfrKaHzTKKtytMjDTJa3_BPIrtqp9tewb8$> > as WG document > > > > At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works > meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor > draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities.. > While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an > interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that > will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks. > > > > thanks > > > > --- tony > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
Support the author's request for adoption. Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only From: Lsr On Behalf Of Tony Przygienda Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:04 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 [External Email. Be cautious of content] I would like to officially call out for adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Rw1hQXbYkcBVgIhCsV-fUUskQePI13qfrKaHzTKKtytMjDTJa3_BPIrtqp9tewb8$> as WG document At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks. thanks --- tony ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Jun 4, 2020, 11:05 AM -0700, Tony Przygienda , wrote: > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG > document > > At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting > use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy > is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. While we would > love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an interoperable solution > between vendors it will be the customer reality that will drive deployment > and ultimately what runs in their networks. > > thanks > > --- tony > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
Support to adopt draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG item. Best, Yiu From: Lsr on behalf of Tony Przygienda Date: Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 2:04 PM To: "lsr@ietf.org" Subject: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 I would like to officially call out for adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Rah0XqtEblwsRxUxVeJLq8ZsrES82w1KgJA0RmeihhUkt_MVU_LQpgBwzBWpQm0$> as WG document At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks. thanks --- tony ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
[Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
We support the adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. Thanks, Alankar ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Re: [Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
I support WG adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. Chris On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:05 PM Tony Przygienda wrote: > I would like to officially call out for adoption of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as > WG document > > At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works > meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor > draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. > While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an > interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that > will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks. > > thanks > > --- tony > ___ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
[Lsr] Call for WG adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01
I would like to officially call out for adoption of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 as WG document At this point in time flood reflection has been implemented and works meeting use case requirements of multiple customers which neither TTZ nor draft-proxy is addressing or can satisfy in terms of deployment realities. While we would love to not squat on codepoints and ideally have an interoperable solution between vendors it will be the customer reality that will drive deployment and ultimately what runs in their networks. thanks --- tony ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
