clear in this document.
It would be useful to specify the same.
--
Uma C.
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:59 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Uma Chunduri
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Point taken…
Les
From: Acee Lindem (acee) ma
,
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 20:38
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in
various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR
some implementation momentum. Anyone disagree?
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
> Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:59 PM
> To: Acee Lindem , Uma Chunduri ,
> "lsr@ietf.org"
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-0
these drafts as I believe they are ready
and we even have some implementation momentum. Anyone disagree?
Thanks,
Acee
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:59 PM
To: Acee Lindem , Uma Chunduri ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls
Les,
Then what you meant in your response was, “generic RLD” as opposed to “generic
MSD”.
Thanks,
Acee
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:46 PM
To: Acee Lindem , Uma Chunduri ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-
, August 28, 2019 11:38 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in
various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label
specific ?
IOW can we just modify this as “
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in
various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label
specific ?
IOW can we just modify this as "readable label depth" as opposed to "en
I know we decided we needed different types of MSD but you’re questioning
whether we really need different types of RLD.
Forwarding implementors?
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr on behalf of Uma Chunduri
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 2:38 PM
To: "lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: [Lsr] draft
Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in
various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label
specific ?
IOW can we just modify this as "readable label depth" as opposed to "entropy
readable label depth" ?
This would allow any other
