Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-05 Thread John Scudder
Hi All, I reviewed the diffs from 05 to 06 and the email; looks good to me, thank you. I see that there is an active discussion going on about Mirja Kühlewind’s TSVART review of 06. It seems to me it would probably be better to let that play out before sending the document for IETF Last Call.

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
ginal Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 9:42 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; John > Scudder ; lsr ; Tony Li ; > gsoli...@protonmail.com; Antoni Przygienda ; Gunter van > de Velde (Nokia) ; Mare

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread Acee Lindem
Hi Bruno, See inline. > On Feb 1, 2024, at 12:30 PM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > Thanks for your quick feedback. Please see inline [Bruno2] > >> From: Acee Lindem >> >> Hi Bruno, >> >> Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. >> >> >>> On Feb 1,

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread Acee Lindem
> On Feb 1, 2024, at 12:33 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > Acee - > >>> --- >>> //Acee >>> >>> A bigger issue from that historical artifact is that some text refers to >>> "LSP >> Burst Window" when they should refer to the "new" (from -01) "Receive >> Window sub-TLV". That's a

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Acee - > > --- > > //Acee > > > > A bigger issue from that historical artifact is that some text refers to > > "LSP > Burst Window" when they should refer to the "new" (from -01) "Receive > Window sub-TLV". That's a bigger issue as "in letter" this may be seen as > technical change (even if "in

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread bruno . decraene
Hi Acee, Thanks for your quick feedback. Please see inline [Bruno2] > From: Acee Lindem > > Hi Bruno, > > Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. > > > > On Feb 1, 2024, at 09:38, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > > > [+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread Acee Lindem
Hi Bruno, Thanks for the work on John’s review comments. See inline. > On Feb 1, 2024, at 09:38, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > [+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as a technical change. > Please looks for //Acee ] > > Hi John, > > Many thanks for your careful

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-05

2024-02-01 Thread bruno . decraene
[+Acee as I'm proposing a change which could be seen as a technical change. Please looks for //Acee ] Hi John, Many thanks for your careful review, your comments and your propositions. I'll upload -06 within minutes. Please see inline [Bruno] > From: John Scudder > Sent: Thursday,