few additional format diffs were introduced by the new author
> tools (not directly by me).
>
> Les
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Scudder
>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 8:46 AM
>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
>> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isi
: John Scudder
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 8:46 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02
>
> Hi Les,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. My comments in line
Hi Les,
Thanks for your prompt reply. My comments in line below.
> On Aug 18, 2022, at 12:49 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
[snipped]
> I have a couple of other points I’ll raise here instead of in line.
>
> 1. I was a little surprised in the Acknowledgements to see that Les is
>
John –
Thanx for the thoughtful review.
I accept all of your editorial changes except as noted below.
Responses inline.
From: Lsr On Behalf Of John Scudder
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 12:02 PM
To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf
Hi Authors,
Thanks for your patience as this clean and easy-to-review document sat in my
queue for too long. :-( Here’s my review.
I’ve supplied my comments in the form of an edited copy of the draft. Minor
editorial suggestions (including at least two reversions to the language of the
base
