Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

2019-09-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Alvaro, Co-authors, et al, I went ahead and changed to “should” for the YANG deviations as well as fixing a couple typos and changing the draft short name from “isis-cfg” to “isis-yang”. The -40 version is posted. Thanks, Acee From: Acee Lindem Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

2019-09-26 Thread Alvaro Retana
On September 26, 2019 at 1:37:47 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker ( nore...@ietf.org) wrote: Acee: Hi! — Section 2.3 — In the last two paragraphs of the section, one uses “should” advertise and the other uses “SHOULD” advertise. They should either both be BCP 14 key words, or both not. In this

Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

2019-09-26 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Barry, Thanks for your review - I've published the -38 version incorporating all your comments and Stewart Bryant's comments in order to avoid duplicates from other reviewers. I did take a pass over the document and added some additional articles. Thanks, Acee On 9/26/19, 1:37 AM, "Barry

[Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

2019-09-25 Thread Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer