ednesday, April 13, 2022 1:54 PM
> *To:* Christian Hopps
> *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Martin Horneffer <
> m...@lab.dtag.de>; Robert Raszuk ; Shraddha Hegde <
> shrad...@juniper.net>; lsr
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link
> Att
13, 2022 1:54 PM
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Martin Horneffer
; Robert Raszuk ; Shraddha Hegde
; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute
(ASLA) Any Application Bit
All
I support Shraddha’s Any bit draft as I think of the change
All
I support Shraddha’s Any bit draft as I think of the change as am
optimization of existing ASLA RFC 8918 and 8919 taking into account
practical deployment considerations when the application specific attribute
differs and having to set the SABM / UDABM bit mask on every link on the
network.
Robert Raszuk writes:
Hi Chris,
It seems that there is a subtle but important element on which we may
have different opinion.
You said: "has to deploy new software that contains the new Wizbang
feature, right?"
IMO however we are dealing with case where software already supports
all
Hi Chris,
It seems that there is a subtle but important element on which we may have
different opinion.
You said: "has to deploy new software that contains the new Wizbang
feature, right?"
IMO however we are dealing with case where software already supports all
required functions on a box. It
Robert Raszuk writes:
Les,
I don't think this is noise.
Your examples are missing key operational consideration .. Link
attribute applicable to ANY application may be advertised well ahead
of enabling such application in a network.
So requesting operator to always advertise tuple of app
> *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2022 5:06 AM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* Shraddha Hegde ; Martin Horneffer <
> m...@lab.dtag.de>; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link
> Attribute (ASLA) Any Application Bit
>
>
>
-topic with your post.
>
>
>
> Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Raszuk
> *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2022 4:41 AM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* Shraddha Hegde ; Martin Horneffer <
> m...@lab.dtag.de>; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ls
to be said.
Les
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 4:53 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: Shraddha Hegde ; Martin Horneffer ;
lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute
(ASLA) Any Application Bit
I am afraid not .. I am
are off-topic with your post.
>
>
>
>Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Raszuk
> *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2022 4:41 AM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* Shraddha Hegde ; Martin Horneffer <
> m...@lab.dtag.de>; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re
, March 25, 2022 4:41 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: Shraddha Hegde ; Martin Horneffer ;
lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute
(ASLA) Any Application Bit
Hi Les,
Let me clarify if I read you correctly ...
Are you saying that because quoted
gt; fixed additional one byte
> > for all vs any ,which is negligible whereas the benefits demonstrated
> for any
> > can be more if
> > more attributes fall in the same category.
> >
> > Rgds
> > Shraddha
> >
> >
> >
> > Juniper Business Use Only
rg (ginsberg) ; Martin
> Horneffer ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute
> (ASLA) Any Application Bit
>
>
> I believe we still have an opportunity to simplify ASLA as it is not that
> widely
> deployed.
> The inter-op
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link Attribute
(ASLA) Any Application Bit
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Martin -
I hear you.
The reality is that ASLA need not be that complex.
In many deployments life is simple. There are a small number of applications
which applications are using the advertised link attribute values.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Martin Horneffer
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2022 8:18 AM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF13: Comments on The Application Specific Link A
Dear WG,
as we just had this discussion and acoustics in the room didn't appear
to be good I was asked to post my comment to the list:
Not a comment on the idea of the ANy Application bit per se, nor on Les'
discussion. Rather a ceterum censeo on ASLA in general:
In my opinion this
Folks -
Now that the slides have been posted for this presentation, I am going to send
some early comments.
I do this because - as usual - the agenda for the meeting is packed and it is
likely there will be little time for discussion during the meeting.
Also my comments are lengthy, it
17 matches
Mail list logo
