– especially in the forwarding plane – and would not be my first
choice as a solution.
??
Les
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 10:58 AM
To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Cc: lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Publication has been requested for
draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-06
Hi Peter
> advertise
> > > > it in base topology ?
> > > >
> > > > Is the "workaround 2" to forget about native
> > forwarding and
> > > use for
> >
> > Algorithm Prefix
> > > > Reachability
> > > > > TLV, the IPv4 Prefix Reachability
> advertisement
> > > MUST be
> > > > preferred
> > > > >
g and
> > use for
> > > example SR and mark the packets such that SID pool
> > corresponding to
> > > base topology forwarding will be separate from
SID pool
> > > corresponding to new fle
draft he quoted:
>> > > >
>> > > > In cases where a prefix advertisement is received
>> > in both
>> > > a IPv4
>> > > > Prefix Reachability TLV and an IPv4 Algorithm
>> Prefix
>> >
; > > /24 use
> > > > default topology for best effort traffic and new
> flex-algo
> > > topology
> > > > for specific application ?
> > > >
> > > > Is the "work
o topology ?
> >
> > Many thx,
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: *Acee Lindem via Datatracker* mailto:nore...@ietf.
ne new) and never
> > advertise
> > > it in base topology ?
> > >
> > > Is the "workaround 2" to forget about native forwarding and
> > use for
> > > example SR and mark the packets su
ponding to new flex-algo topology ?
>
> Many thx,
> Robert
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *Acee Lindem via Datatracker* mailto:nore...@ietf.org>
> <mailto:nore...@ietf.org <mailto:nore...@i
ng to
> > base topology forwarding will be separate from SID pool
> > corresponding to new flex-algo topology ?
> >
> > Many thx,
> > Robert
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From:
--
From: *Acee Lindem via Datatracker* mailto:nore...@ietf.org>>
Date: Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:36 PM
Subject: [Lsr] Publication has been requested for
draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-06
To: mailto:j...@juniper.net>>
Cc: mailto:a...@cisco.com>>,
mailto:iesg-secre
or
> example SR and mark the packets such that SID pool corresponding to base
> topology forwarding will be separate from SID pool corresponding to new
> flex-algo topology ?
>
> Many thx,
> Robert
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Acee Lindem via Datatracker
Acee Lindem has requested publication of draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-06 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the LSR working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo/
___
Lsr mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
