gt;Les
>
>
>
> *From:* Tony Przygienda
> *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2022 10:27 AM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* draft-white-lsr-distoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood
>
>
>
>
nothing needs to be said
in this regard isn’t justified.
Les
From: Tony Przygienda
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 10:27 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: draft-white-lsr-distoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood
On Mon, Nov 28
Tony -
From: Tony Przygienda
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 10:06 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: r...@riw.us; draft-white-lsr-distoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 6:22 PM Les Ginsberg
t almost all implemenations I know do it by default
anyway since long time).
so yes, very good points you make and feel free to suggest verbiage to
cover it or otherwise we take care of that in next releasee
-- tony
>
>
>Les
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tony Przygienda
&
istoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re[2]: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr-distoptflood
> >
> >
> > >1)You can successfully deploy this algorithm in the presence of nodes
> > >which do NOT support this algorithm. But you cannot successfull
Hi Russ!
> -Original Message-
> From: r...@riw.us
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 4:56 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Tony Przygienda
>
> Cc: draft-white-lsr-distoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re[2]: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr-di
1)You can successfully deploy this algorithm in the presence of nodes
which do NOT support this algorithm. But you cannot successfully deploy
this algorithm in the presence of nodes which enable a different
flooding reduction algorithm.
This is correct. There seem to be two sides to this
in the draft and
an analysis of the benefits under some realistic flooding scenarios.
Les
From: Tony Przygienda
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2022 1:06 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: draft-white-lsr-distoptflood.auth...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Questions on draft-white-lsr
Les, bits delay since I had to think a bits about your comment to do it
justice and it's bit long'ish
1. So, to start with a cut and dry summary and reasoning for it, I am
firmly against adding signaling to the whole thing by some means (or rather
any procedures to act upon distribution of info
Draft authors -
The WG adoption call reminded me that I had some questions following the
presentation of this draft at IETF 114 which we decided to "take to the list" -
but we/I never did.
Looking at the minutes, there was this exchange:
Les: I'm not convinced that you don't need to
10 matches
Mail list logo