On Wed, May 10, 2023, 2:10 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
>
> Watson -
>
> Where are we with this discission?
> Have my responses clarified things sufficiently or do you still have
> unresolved issues?
Apologies for the delay. I think I understand the issue. If all
devices are in one
draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-
> c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01
>
> Watson -
>
> Please see LES2: inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Watson Ladd
> >
ay 4, 2023 4:19 PM
> > > To: sec...@ietf.org
> > > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
> > > lsr@ietf.org
> > > Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-01
> > >
> > > Reviewer: W
t;
> Inline...
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Watson Ladd via Datatracker
> > Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 4:19 PM
> > To: sec...@ietf.org
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: Secdir last
comments.
Inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Watson Ladd via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 4:19 PM
> To: sec...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf
Reviewer: Watson Ladd
Review result: Has Issues
Dear all,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document
