I support adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:58 PM Acee Lindem wrote:
> LSR Working Group,
>
> This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
> Please indicate your suppo
Hi, I support this adoption.
Best regards,
--satoru
> 2023/08/24 4:58、Acee Lindem のメール:
>
> LSR Working Group,
>
> This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
> Please
wishes
Thomas Graf
On 2023-08-23, 3:58 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem" mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of acee.i...@gmail.com
<mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
LSR Working Group,
This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
Announc
Hi Acee,
In any case, one will need to update the signaling routers and the routers
> acting on the signal.
I guess this is clear to all.
Additionally, your request for the adoption was that the draft have a
> stronger statement about the mechanism being used for solely for signaling
> for
30, 2023 6:33 PM
> > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
> > ; linchangwang ;
> > Acee Lindem ; lsr
> > Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> >
> > > From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf
> > > Of Peter Psenak
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 8:43 AM
> > > To: linchangwang
> > > mailto:linchangwang.04...@h3c.com>>; Acee
> > > Lindem
> > >
Peter,
> > I am not sure what harm would it make to start WG adoption call on both
> > drafts and see the results.
> >
> > So far I am not seeing strong and uniform adoption support for either
> > one :)
>
> I hope you are not serious. Having two different ways of signalling the
> same thing in
em mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>>;
lsr mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
> Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable
) ; linchangwang
; Acee Lindem ; lsr
; draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
> it would be helpful to summarize the common parts of the
Robert,
On 31/08/2023 02:36, Robert Raszuk wrote:
it would be helpful to summarize the common parts of the two solutions,
Actually IMO it would be much more helpful to summarise differences of
both solutions not common parts.
please read both drafts and you would easily get the
> draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
>
>
>
> *Hi Les,*
>
>
>
> > But existing implementatio
raft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
>
> Hi Le
-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
Hi Les,
> But existing implementations will NOT ignore a prefix reachability
> advertisement just because
> it has a s
ecision is made.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > 2. The Draft #1 utilizes the existing mechanisms [RFC7794] and
>
> > > > > [RFC9084] to
>
> > > > indicate reachability by checking whether the originator information
>
> > > &
tf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
>
> Hi Les:
>
> I think you may have connected something. Existing routers, on receiving a
> prefix reachability
> To: Peter Psenak ; linchangwang
> ; Acee Lindem ;
> lsr
> Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
>
>
43 AM
> To: linchangwang ; Acee Lindem
> ; lsr
> Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
>
> Changwang,
: Thursday, August 24, 2023 3:58 AM
To: lsr
Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement"
- draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
LSR Working Group,
This begins the working group ado
24, 2023 3:58 AM
To: lsr
Cc: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement"
- draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04
LSR Working Group,
This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP U
> LSR Working Group,
>
> This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
> Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
> Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September
> 7th, 20
; wrote:
LSR Working Group,
This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September 7th,
2023.
Thanks,
Acee
_
LSR Working Group,
This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix
Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September 7th,
2023.
Thanks,
Acee
22 matches
Mail list logo
