Re: [Lsr] YANG requirements for IDR drafts (was Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20))

Hi Jeff, Many thx for your note. As I clarified to Sue my question was really about LSR WG not IDR :) And the trigger was Gunter's claim that his employer's OS is already sending content of LSDB over YANG. So I was a bit puzzled what happens with new extensions if they like ISIS reflection if

[Lsr] YANG requirements for IDR drafts (was Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20))

Robert, > On Jun 30, 2022, at 6:56 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > Isn't the YANG section a requirement for all protocol extension documents > before they are sent for publications these days ? > We're not yet to the point where extensions to YANG modules are part of base IETF work, but