Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

Hi Shraddha, draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-00 was published May 15, 2018 (over two years ago). It clearly stated: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-00#section-9 "To advertise a link affinity in a form of the AG or EAG that is used during Flex-Algorithm calculation, an

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS Topology-Transparent Zone" - draft-chen-isis-ttz-11.txt

I support working group adoption of this draft. Best, Ruoxin Sent from Outlook From: Lsr on behalf of reta Yang Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 7:48 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "IS-IS

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

Tony – Inline. From: Tony Li On Behalf Of tony...@tony.li Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 8:56 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt Hi Les, [Les:] Any one of the IERs can be elected Area Leader, therefore all

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

Les, > [Les:] Thanx for clarifying this. A careful reading of the draft supports > what you say, but as this point could be easily overlooked it might be worth > emphasizing this in the draft. Noted and enhanced. > We do NOT require that the Area Leader candidates have identical >

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

Tony – The statement “the … Prefix SID does NOT have the semantics that we want and causes deleterious side-effects” is FALSE. Other than that, we understand each other and we disagree. You have my input. There is an alternative here: Given that there isn’t any defined use case for the Area

Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-03.txt

Les, > The statement “the … Prefix SID does NOT have the semantics that we want and > causes deleterious side-effects” is FALSE. Ahem. I disagree. No need to be rude about it. > There is an alternative here: > > Given that there isn’t any defined use case for the Area Prefix/SID, you