sideration of redundancy.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2019年5月28日 15:34
收件人: Aijun Wang; 'Tony Li'; 'Robert Raszuk'
抄送: lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] 答复: Option B from "Migration between normal flooding and
flooding reduction&
Hi Robert,
On 29/05/2019 10:31, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hey Peter,
> Is it more efficient that only one area leader
indicates(according to the command from NMS) explicitly then the
network will be back to normal flooding?
yes and we have that in the draft:
"When the Area
Hey Peter,
> > Is it more efficient that only one area leader indicates(according to
> the command from NMS) explicitly then the network will be back to normal
> flooding?
>
> yes and we have that in the draft:
>
> "When the Area Leader advertises algorithm 0 in its Area Leader Sub-
> TLV
送时间: 2019年5月28日 15:34
收件人: Aijun Wang; 'Tony Li'; 'Robert Raszuk'
抄送: lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Lsr] 答复: Option B from "Migration between normal flooding and flooding
reduction"
Aijun,
On 28/05/2019 08:15, Aijun Wang wrote:
Hi, Tony:
How the receiver judge the leader has stopped adverti
r the number of candidate area leaders, I support we should have more
> than one for consideration of redundancy.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> 发送时间: 2019年5月28日 15:34
> 收件人: Aijun Wang; 'Tony Li'; 'Robert Raszuk'
> 抄送: lsr@ietf.org
> 主题:
