Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; The IESG <
> i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org;
> lsr@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
> *Subject:* Re: Warren Kumari's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> That seems reasonable.
&
Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-02:
(with COMMENT)
That seems reasonable.
Les, I encourage you not to wait for the end of IESG review to make the change,
if you’re going to — maybe it will help someone else even though Warren did
extra work (sorry Warren, I tried).
—John
That seems reasonable.
Les, I encourage you not to wait for the end of IESG review to make the change,
if you’re going to — maybe it will help someone else even though Warren did
extra work (sorry Warren, I tried).
—John
On May 18, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Thu, May 18,
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 11:35 AM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
> Warren -
>
> Thanx for the thoughtful (and entertaining [image: ]) review.
>
> I have no objection to adding a forward reference to the "changes" section
> for both this document and draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis. My only concern is
> whether
Warren -
Thanx for the thoughtful (and entertaining ) review.
I have no objection to adding a forward reference to the "changes" section for
both this document and draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis.
My only concern is whether this violates the guideline that the "abstract
should be complete in
