Hello all
I have set up several LTSP 4 servers in the past using FC 4 -6 with very
little problems. I am building a LTSP - thin client setup for a call
center in Portland Oregon and I started off with Fedora 7. I have been
having major issues getting the KDM login to work. Seems there is
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:34:22 -0700
Jaimie Garner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started off with Fedora 7. I have been
having major issues getting the KDM login to work.
I am using Fedora 7 with LTSP 4.2 and have no problems like that. I'm using
GDM.
Are you sure you have updated your F7 to
I've been using LTSP 4.2 on both Xubuntu 6.10 and Ubuntu 6.06, basically
since those distros were released. No LTSP-related problems whatsoever.
I'm also now using K12LTSP 5.0EL (which is CentOS 5 and LTSP 4.2). I
haven't been using it long enough to claim it's perfectly stable, but I
haven't
The new LDM script available on launchpad.net adds additional lts.conf options
such as LDM_DIRECTX. This allows users to connect without proxying X traffic
through SSH, which has improved the performance a great deal. Unfortunately, I
have trouble using the lock screen and switch user
On Saturday 30 June 2007 03:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking for help regarding time controlled logins to ltsp
workstations. I have ltsp 4.2 with Fedora Core 6 installed,
authentication is done through LDAP.
This is for a proposed public access solution at one of our educational
I have been using ltsp 4.2 (K12ltsp 6 and earlier) for a few years now
and now I want to get up to speed with ltsp 5. I have downloaded
Edubuntu Gutsy Gibbon Daily build and I have installed it as a VMware
VM. How do I keep it up to date to try out the latest ltsp 5 features?
Do I just run all the
On Saturday 30 June 2007 03:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have set up several LTSP 4 servers in the past using FC 4 -6 with very
little problems. I am building a LTSP - thin client setup for a call
center in Portland Oregon and I started off with Fedora 7. I have been
having major issues
I'm about to start running cable through plastic conduits for cat5 that were
run parallel to AC lines, also inside plastic conduits. It's all cemented
into walls.
Is there are hope of this conduit still being useful? Do I need to
reinstall or reroute the cat5 cables elsewhere, away from the
Check you local electric codes. Oregon you can not run low voltage with
High voltage they would have to be in their own conduits. I am not sure
on emi though but I have ran cat5 and 110 together with no problems.
Jaimie
light being wrote:
I'm about to start running cable through plastic
I am not worried about OS changes I run an ISP that provides services to
the sate of Oregon and use several os's, everything from Debian to
Solaris even have 1 box built from the Linux From Scratch so moving
around distros does not bother me. The hardware checks out it's all
good. have
I'm in brazil, codes are not exactly a problem...
Some runs being around 80 feet and the espresso machine using up to 2500
watts might be more serious.
Maybe I'll try using shielded cable for the first time in my life...
Check you local electric codes. Oregon you can not run low voltage
I would think if the AC is shielded and the Cat5 is shielded should be
fine. if you can I would do a short test run if there are some junction
boxes where you could pull the cat5 out. Running 80 not that big a deal
if you had to pull it all out and do something different.
light being wrote:
From your initial post, it sounds like the AC and CAT5 will each be in
their own conduit (i.e., the AC will NOT be running in the SAME
conduit as the cat-5). If this is the case, I suspect you'll be fine
with 100Mbps..Don't know about Gig, though.
If you're concerned, running shielded cable (and
13 matches
Mail list logo
