On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:36 AM, jam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I configured my DNS under bind. However, I noticed that after
booting 4 or 5 thin clients, bind9 would magically stop replying to
queries. At this point, sudo would become very slow and few of my clients
would be
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:19:36PM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
Thanks Steve, I didn't know gPXE was universal because I only downloaded
images
from rom-o-matic.
you can download a universal gPXE iso from rom-o-matic.net, just select the
gpxe:all-drivers driver. why it isn't the default is
On Thursday 20 November 2008 04:27:31 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will do, but Im just annoyed by the individual ROM generation from
ROM-o-matic. My refurbished units all have different lan cards and I
was hoping for a universal diskette bootrom.
Any help? :)
I think
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Steve Cayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:47 AM, JF Straeten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps could you give gPXE a try, instead of etherboot, and see if
it
change
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Mark David Dumlao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Are my local services performing DNS lookups? Why? How do I get them to
stop doing that?
I've screwed up my host name in the past, lo and behold, sudo, ssh and
probably some others become really slow or unusable. It
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
[...]
Anyways, it would seem that I have two problems that ask for a solution:
1) Are my local services performing DNS lookups? Why? How do I get them
to stop doing that?
2) Is my pdns / bind / whatever dns under attack by bots using rndc? How
do I stop them?
This
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 09:06:34PM -0600, Steve Cayford wrote:
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:47 AM, JF Straeten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps could you give gPXE a try, instead of etherboot, and see if it
change anything ?
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:47 AM, JF Straeten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps could you give gPXE a try, instead of etherboot, and see if it
change anything ?
Will do, but Im just annoyed by the individual ROM generation from
I think that server should be able to handle 10 clients or more, based
on my experience. It'll depend somewhat on what applications you're
running, but for basic office stuff 10 clients should be no problem.
Check /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf to make sure that you have more than 5
addresses in your
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:47 AM, JF Straeten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps could you give gPXE a try, instead of etherboot, and see if it
change anything ?
Will do, but Im just annoyed by the individual ROM generation from
ROM-o-matic. My refurbished units all have different lan cards and I
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Mark David Dumlao [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
5 - disk channel
I'll make sure tomorrow that my RAID disks are on different channels. But I
think they already are, and I think that even if they were on the same
channel, the performance wouldn't be THAT bad.
Yipes.
Hello ltsp-discuss list!
I'm setting up a thin client laboratory for a computer school in the
Philippines, in the Visayas region, and I'm encountering some difficulties
with getting the clients to boot up.
Problem statement:
I have a lab of 20 units booting off of a lower-middle class desktop
Mark,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:35:38AM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
3 - Etherboot is dumb
maybe etherboot is just discarding DHCP requests because it isn't very
smart. How much intelligence can you fit on a floppy disk anyhow?
But this is suspect, because other clients besides
13 matches
Mail list logo
