The mismatch was due to a bug in the man pages which was not discovered
until March 29, 2010 which can happen in any software, open source or
not.
The bug was discovered by inspecting the source code when the XRANDR
settings seemed not to be working, which can be done only when the
source code is
Vagrant Cascadian schrieb am 19. Nov 2010 um 18:46:06 CET:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:54:50AM +0100, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Gideon Romm schrieb am 17. Nov 2010 um 15:38:20 CET:
The lts.conf params should be:
XRANDR_MODE_0
NOT
XRANDR_MODE_01
(note the single digit. It is in the
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:54:50AM +0100, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
Gideon Romm schrieb am 17. Nov 2010 um 15:38:20 CET:
The lts.conf params should be:
XRANDR_MODE_0
NOT
XRANDR_MODE_01
(note the single digit. It is in the same style as the old X_MODE_0)
Arrgh!
This took
Hi,
I'm stuck with a problem concerning the screen resolution on recent thinclient
hardware.
Some info first:
Thin client: CPU Intel Atom N270 1.6 GHz 2GB RAM Chipset 945GSE+ICH7M
This thin client is a testmachine from
http://openthinclient.com/ (Model 1697),
The lts.conf params should be:
XRANDR_MODE_0
NOT
XRANDR_MODE_01
(note the single digit. It is in the same style as the old X_MODE_0)
-Gadi
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards
Gideon Romm schrieb am 17. Nov 2010 um 15:38:20 CET:
The lts.conf params should be:
XRANDR_MODE_0
NOT
XRANDR_MODE_01
(note the single digit. It is in the same style as the old X_MODE_0)
Arrgh!
This took me at least 2 days of testing. :^(
I simply followed the man page of lts.conf
Hi
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
[MAC ADRESS]
X_MODE_0 = 800x600
This happen only with one thin-client, the 2 others works correctly
(the 3
On Sunday 11 January 2009 00:29:41 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
I'm just posting my experience in case anybody else is fighting the same
battle I just fought...
I just spent a lot of time troubleshooting some video resolution issues.
No matter what I did, I couldn't get
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:34:07PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
I just spent a lot of time troubleshooting some video resolution issues. No
matter what I did, I couldn't get my 17 CRT monitor to display better than
800x600 resolution. I tried manually setting the resolution and forcing the
vesa
I'm just posting my experience in case anybody else is fighting the same battle
I just fought...
I just spent a lot of time troubleshooting some video resolution issues. No
matter what I did, I couldn't get my 17 CRT monitor to display better than
800x600 resolution. I tried manually setting
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Is it still possible to change screen resolution in LTSP5 through lts.conf? I
look into lts-parameters.gz and there's no any mentioning of it.
One of my clients only shows 800x600, I want to change it to 1024x768.
Happy holidays,
I think it should work
On Thursday 27 December 2007 22:03:33 Frank Lienhard wrote:
I think it should work with lts.conf
1.Make a section for the client, like this:
## which client##
[00:00:00:00:00:00]
X_MODE_0 = 1280x1024
XSERVER = vesa
1.line: comment (which client etc.
2.line: macadress of the client
Hi all,
Is it still possible to change screen resolution in LTSP5 through lts.conf? I
look into lts-parameters.gz and there's no any mentioning of it.
One of my clients only shows 800x600, I want to change it to 1024x768.
Happy holidays,
--
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux
I use this to get a generic 1440x900 to display on LTSP4.1. Some old VIA
chipsets cannot display widescreen though.
X_VERTREFRESH = 56-76
X_HORZSYNC = 30-82
X_MODE_0= 1440x900 106.47 1440 1520 1672 1904
900 901 904 932 -HSync
Hi,
The only thing I cannot get right on ltsp-4.2 is a screen resolution of
1440x900, even entering the resolution and sync rates. It works fine on
ltsp-5, but I'm using the Debian tarball on a Slackware-12 install and
printers and local storage are proving to be a nightmare. I would
happily
Andrew wrote:
Hi,
The only thing I cannot get right on ltsp-4.2 is a screen resolution of
1440x900, even entering the resolution and sync rates. It works fine on
ltsp-5, but I'm using the Debian tarball on a Slackware-12 install and
printers and local storage are proving to be a
Andrew,
I had the issue you mentioned and I found the reason was that the nvidia
drivers were not being loaded on the client in LTSP 4.2.
A little more information on this client would be beneficial to you here.
Regards,
Dan
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:19:50 +0200, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Maranville wrote:
Andrew,
I had the issue you mentioned and I found the reason was that the nvidia
drivers were not being loaded on the client in LTSP 4.2.
A little more information on this client would be beneficial to you here.
Regards,
Dan
This is a Compaq Deskpro with
Dear all,
I already built ltsp ver.4.2 under fedora 6 and running well on
800x600 resolution on client monitor. I try using 1024x768 res but
failed with blank screen.
I remember that when use ubuntu 6.10 with this monitor can use
1024x768 resolution and I run xvidtune and get this:
1024x768
Diwakoe a écrit :
Dear all,
Dear alone,
I already built ltsp ver.4.2 under fedora 6 and running well on
800x600 resolution on client monitor. I try using 1024x768 res but
failed with blank screen.
I remember that when use ubuntu 6.10 with this monitor can use
1024x768 resolution and I
On 5/1/07, Jean-Yves F. Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear alone,
Hi, I run under Debian etch (xorg ltsp 4.2) and had the opposite
problem: I've got a monitor that is not able any more to go up to its
maximum specs (electronic PB), so I must use it in lower resolutions.
Assigning an
Hi
So far, so good. Got it working, with one exception:
The screen resolution stays at what looks like somewhere around 800x600,
no matter what I do.
I've tried setting X_MODE_0 with all sorts of values and rebooted the
workstation countless times.
No change. ( and the XWindows
So far, so good. Got it working, with one exception:
The screen resolution stays at what looks like somewhere around 800x600,
no matter what I do.
I've tried setting X_MODE_0 with all sorts of values and rebooted the
workstation countless times.
No change. ( and the XWindows ctrl-alt-kb+
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 08:07, Robert Reppel wrote:
The screen resolution stays at what looks like somewhere around 800x600,
no matter what I do.
[SNIP]
I'm using a Cirrus Logic GD-5440 video card.
How much vid memory on the card? If it no more than 1mb then 800x600 is
max you will get. Need
24 matches
Mail list logo
