This is a question for LTSP 4.2
There are different types of optical mice here on my system, some of
them have 400, some 800 dpi. For the faster ones, I defined
X_MOUSE_RESOLUTION = 800 in lts.conf, but there is no effect at all.
They still run rather fast.
Is there any other way of achieving
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:49:14 +0200
Rolf-Werner Eilert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any other way of achieving this,
Depending on the Linux distribution that you're using, the users can probably
set the mouse speed that they prefer themselves.
On Fedora 8, you go to Main Menu - System -
Frank Cox schrieb:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:49:14 +0200
Rolf-Werner Eilert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any other way of achieving this,
Depending on the Linux distribution that you're using, the users can probably
set the mouse speed that they prefer themselves.
On Fedora 8, you go
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:09:56 +0200
Rolf-Werner Eilert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm - but in a school environment with users changing working places and
logging in from wherever, this would be rather roundabout if they had to
adjust their personal mouse speed over and over again, wouldn't it?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:09:56 +0200
Rolf-Werner Eilert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm - but in a school environment with users changing working places and
logging in from wherever, this would be rather roundabout if they had to
Tim Jackson wrote:
Can anyone help with info about how to get a driver and correct vidlist
entry for the Via Unichrome Pro II video for a 4.2 ltsp configuration.
The system I am working with is VERSION=4.2 update 2.
For the VIA PCI-Ids see http://pci-ids.ucw.cz/iii/?i=1106 or just run
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:55:26PM +0100, Garry Saddington wrote:
snip
OK, so I've got (so far) 90 students / 3 servers = 30 students a server.
8000M - 512M(for the server bits) / 30 = ~250M per student, ram requirements.
So, lets go forward with these rough calculations.
log on times in the
Guys-
That doesn't work, because tftpd runs in a chroot'd environment. No
symlinks allowed (you kinda would break the security that way).
That's why it is not in /etc/ltsp (which would be logical).
And, moving the tftpboot directory is undesirable, as well. So, that's
where we are.
-G
On
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:18:08AM -0400, Gideon Romm wrote:
Guys-
That doesn't work, because tftpd runs in a chroot'd environment. No
symlinks allowed (you kinda would break the security that way).
That's why it is not in /etc/ltsp (which would be logical).
In about 5 minutes I know
On Friday 05 September 2008 22:18:21
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anybody can explain to a bear of little brain :-)
Once-upon-a-time xhost + would allow anybody to write to your display.
That is no longer true with ltsp-5
I have clients say ws001 with user HeHim logged-on.
IMe want
Sure, that way will work, but usually the intent of keeping it in /etc
is so that you can backup, say, /etc only and recover easily or,
move /etc to another drive or some such.
Simply symlinking it in the way you do has the only convenience of not
having to type or remember the path to tftpboot.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:57:36AM -0400, Gideon Romm wrote:
Simply symlinking it in the way you do has the only convenience of not
having to type or remember the path to tftpboot. :)
Agreed.
Cheers,
Scott
--
Scott L. Balneaves | There are many causes I am prepared to die for,
Systems
I've seen this page:
http://wiki.debian.org/LTSP/Howto
which says to use a special repository for LTSP if you're running Debian
Etch. What about Debian Lenny? What's the best way to get the most
up-to-date LTSP packages for Lenny? (or do the Lenny repos already have
the most up-to-date?)
Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:57:36AM -0400, Gideon Romm wrote:
Simply symlinking it in the way you do has the only convenience of not
having to type or remember the path to tftpboot. :)
Agreed.
I definitely understand the situation better now - thank you
Jordan Erickson wrote:
Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:57:36AM -0400, Gideon Romm wrote:
Simply symlinking it in the way you do has the only convenience of not
having to type or remember the path to tftpboot. :)
Agreed.
I definitely understand the situation
Jordan Erickson wrote:
Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:57:36AM -0400, Gideon Romm wrote:
Simply symlinking it in the way you do has the only convenience of not
having to type or remember the path to tftpboot. :)
Agreed.
I definitely understand the situation
Does anyone out there have tips on how to get more than 640 by 480 on Intel
82865G Video running on a Dell Optiplex GX270?
I'm using LTSP running on 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04.1.
I've tried using X_MODE_0=1024x768, and various X_VIDEORAM settings from 96MB
down to 8MB- thus far no luck.
I just get
Have you tried either:
XSERVER=i810
or
XSERVER=intel
?
-Gadi
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 13:13 -0400, Patrick Rady wrote:
Does anyone out there have tips on how to get more than 640 by 480 on Intel
82865G Video running on a Dell Optiplex GX270?
I'm using LTSP running on 64-bit Ubuntu
I've tried i810...
But not Intel... I guess that will be this afternoon's project. :)
-
Patrick Rady
Administrator, npServ
NEW (Nonprofit Enterprise at Work)
office 734-998-0160 ext. 212 / fax 734-998-0163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.new.org/
Ann Arbor Office: 1100 N. Main, Suite 100, Ann
Fredag 5. september 2008, skrev Patrick Rady:
Does anyone out there have tips on how to get more than 640 by 480 on
Intel 82865G Video running on a Dell Optiplex GX270?
I know that the gx260 has an option in BIOS to use either 1mb or 8mb for
videoram (i think it's under integrated devices, or
Horst Prote wrote:
Tim Jackson wrote:
Can anyone help with info about how to get a driver and correct vidlist
entry for the Via Unichrome Pro II video for a 4.2 ltsp configuration.
The system I am working with is VERSION=4.2 update 2.
For the VIA PCI-Ids see
21 matches
Mail list logo
