Le 22/09/2016 à 11:10, Alkis Georgopoulos a écrit :
> On 22/09/2016 11:25 πμ, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I have setup a xenial ltsp pnp server.
>>
>> Is LTSP_FAT_CLIENT=True/False the only config needed in lts.conf to switch ?
>>
>> Is ldm mandatory for fat client ?
>>
>
> 1) Yes.
>
On 22/09/2016 11:25 πμ, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have setup a xenial ltsp pnp server.
>
> Is LTSP_FAT_CLIENT=True/False the only config needed in lts.conf to switch ?
>
> Is ldm mandatory for fat client ?
>
1) Yes.
Note also that there is a FAT_RAM_THRESHOLD variable, which defaults
Le 22/09/2016 à 08:59, Rolf-Werner Eilert a écrit :
> Am 21.09.2016 09:34, schrieb LTSP-PNP Adam:
>> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
>>> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
>>> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
Am 21.09.2016 09:34, schrieb LTSP-PNP Adam:
> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
>> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
>> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
>>
> If you need - I have made quick Howto install LTSP-PNP
Thank you very much for your concise answer, Helmut.
Am 21.09.2016 09:19, schrieb Helmut Lichtenberg:
> Hi,
>
> Rolf-Werner Eilert schrieb am 21.09.2016 08:36:
>> Am 20.09.2016 19:34, schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
>>> The main advantage of LTSP Fat Clients, especially in today's media-rich
>>>
Hi,
Rolf-Werner Eilert schrieb am 21.09.2016 08:36:
> Am 20.09.2016 19:34, schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
> > The main advantage of LTSP Fat Clients, especially in today's media-rich
> > environment, is that applications take full advantage of the client
> > hardware. This is really important with
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
>
If you need - I have made quick Howto install LTSP-PNP for fat clients:
Hi Vagrant,
thanks for your answer.
Am 20.09.2016 19:34, schrieb Vagrant Cascadian:
> On 2016-09-20, Rolf-Werner Eilert wrote:
>> What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
>> more than just independent PCs with a complete OS which merely mount
>> their $HOMEs from
Am 20.09.2016 19:22, schrieb LTSP-PNP Adam:
> W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
>> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
>> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
>>
>> What would be the main reason for preferring fat
On 2016-09-20, Rolf-Werner Eilert wrote:
> What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
> more than just independent PCs with a complete OS which merely mount
> their $HOMEs from some kind of NAS?
In the context of LTSP, Fat Clients boot from the network and
W dniu 20.09.2016 o 12:38, Rolf-Werner Eilert pisze:
> As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
> about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
>
> What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
> more than just independent
As I am currently planning a new LTSP environment, there is the question
about thin or fat clients. We have a thin client setup now.
What would be the main reason for preferring fat clients? Is fat clients
more than just independent PCs with a complete OS which merely mount
their $HOMEs from
12 matches
Mail list logo
