- On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Yuxin Ren r...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
> Hi Boqun and Paul,
>
> Thank you so much for your help.
>
> I found one reason to use that lock.
> In the slow path, a thread will move all waiters to a local queue.
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:38:40PM +, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Yuxin Ren r...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
>
> > Hi Boqun and Paul,
> >
> > Thank you so much for your help.
> >
> > I found one reason to use that lock.
> > In the slow path, a thread will move
Hi Paul and Yuxin,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:23:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Try building without it and see what happens when you run the tests.
>
I've run a 'regtest' with the following modification out of curiousity:
diff --git a/urcu.c b/urcu.c
index a5568bdbd075..9dc3c9feae56
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:01PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi Paul and Yuxin,
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:23:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Try building without it and see what happens when you run the tests.
> >
>
> I've run a 'regtest' with the following modification out of
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:47:23AM -0400, Yuxin Ren wrote:
> Hi Boqun and Paul,
>
> Thank you so much for your help.
>
> I found one reason to use that lock.
> In the slow path, a thread will move all waiters to a local queue.
> https://github.com/urcu/userspace-rcu/blob/master/urcu.c#L406
>
Hi Boqun and Paul,
Thank you so much for your help.
I found one reason to use that lock.
In the slow path, a thread will move all waiters to a local queue.
https://github.com/urcu/userspace-rcu/blob/master/urcu.c#L406
After this, following thread can also perform grace period, as the
global
- On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Yuxin Ren r...@gwmail.gwu.edu wrote:
> Hi Boqun and Paul,
>
> Thank you so much for your help.
>
> I found one reason to use that lock.
> In the slow path, a thread will move all waiters to a local queue.
>
On 2016-04-28 12:16, Michael Jeanson wrote:
- On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:04 PM, Simon Marchi
simon.mar...@polymtl.ca wrote:
On 2016-04-27 22:52, Simon Marchi wrote:
Since these files are generated by autoconf, they shouldn't be
included
in SCRIPT_LIST, which is the list of scripts to copy
- On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:04 PM, Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca wrote:
> On 2016-04-27 22:52, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> Since these files are generated by autoconf, they shouldn't be included
>> in SCRIPT_LIST, which is the list of scripts to copy from the source
>> directory to the build
- On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca wrote:
>
> Ok thanks.
>
> Just an idea: I find it quite cumbersome to add a new entry in
> configure.ac for each test script that we want autoconf to process (such
> as in patch 3/3). I think it could be easier to have a
On 2016-04-28 14:28, Michael Jeanson wrote:
- On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Simon Marchi
simon.mar...@polymtl.ca wrote:
Ok thanks.
Just an idea: I find it quite cumbersome to add a new entry in
configure.ac for each test script that we want autoconf to process
(such
as in patch 3/3). I
11 matches
Mail list logo
