I don't agree that MacOS is proprietary, btw.
http://news.com.com/Is+the+telephone+industry+ready+for+open+source/
2008-1082_3-5737703.html
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://news.com.com/Is+the+telephone+industry+ready+for+open+source/2008-1082_3-5737703.html
Perhaps you could enlighten us with an informed talk on Linux-based
PBX? I imagine that a home/office-based telephone server may have
quite a bit of commercial potential. (For
Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Perhaps you could enlighten us with an informed talk on Linux-based
PBX? I imagine that a home/office-based telephone server may have
quite a bit of commercial potential. (For example, I always hate to
carry a cell phone with an address book, as it may contain
On Jun 10, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Tom Gordon wrote:
Why would MacOS not be considered proprietary? Who knows, maybe Jim
is reffering to OSX, or something. I do know there are still bits
I can't get at. But I'll admit, I gave up quickly.
The Apple-approved name is not OSX, but rather MacOS
showing. :-)Its nearly trivial to setup. Does LUAU/HOSEF have
technical get-togethers with speakers? (Or is that CyberPizza? (And what
about those of us trying to cut down on carbs?))
I brought my new linux-powered car PC to the Talk-Shop on Monday, but the
only other people who
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:18 -1000, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Jun 10, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
http://news.com.com/Is+the+telephone+industry+ready+for+open
+source/2008-1082_3-5737703.html
Perhaps you could enlighten us with an informed talk on
I've been using Matt's service for a few weeks now and so far it works
great. I'm using Residential Road Runner and I haven't needed to
prioritize my traffic. However, if I'm downloading or uploading while on
a call we start to breakup. Which is exactly what Matt had told me would
happen.
Do
