On 6/13/05, Eric Hattemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoever Whatever wrote:
Hi,
I was running Mandrake 9.2 for mythtv up to .18.1 on a shuttle
sk41g using PVR350 for about 2 years, nvidia tv-out, no problem
The PVR350 is hardware accelerated via ivtv, so that's unlikely to use
more
On Jun 13, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Ben Timmerman wrote:
Concerning Brian Chee's offer of workstations, racks, etc., that
gotta be gone by the end of this week..whatever of this is
going to be gobbled up by HOSEF's warehouse space/mission, I have a
full-sized VW passenger van with the middle
http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/i_know_chmod.jpg
(Warning: while this image is work-safe, many others in the same
directory are not.)
Today solaris is open-source. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/
Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/
At 06:45 am Tuesday 14 06, Jim wrote:
concerning Brian Chee's offer of equipment...
...So lets do it mid-week. I've got a strong back and a weak
mind.Can't take more than 2-3 of us...
So-o-o-o, yer saying that HOSEF is gonna gobble this stuff up?But your
weak mind tells me you don't
Open, but not Free.
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Tim Newsham wrote:
Today solaris is open-source. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/
Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
On Jun 14, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Ben Timmerman wrote:
At 06:45 am Tuesday 14 06, Jim wrote:
concerning Brian Chee's offer of equipment...
...So lets do it mid-week. I've got a strong back and a weak
mind.Can't take more than 2-3 of us...
So-o-o-o, yer saying that HOSEF is gonna gobble
Whoever Whatever wrote:
Any thing else which I am over looking? I am recompiling the kernel
today to see if that make a different. I did some search on google,
there are alot of complain on fedora running slower compair to some
other dist, I want to nail down the cause first else I will be
It's moving time and we got lots to do. Here is the breakdown of what we
need to move and where.
UH - Brian Chee
- 16 computers - Hahaione Elem
(http://165.248.6.166/data/school.asp?schoolcode=108)
- Black Rack - Charter School ( Bishop Street Ste. 516)
- Beige Rack - McKinley Storage
-
Open, but not Free.
Free for my eyes, which is cheaper than it was yesterday.
Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/
On Jun 14, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Tim Newsham wrote:
Open, but not Free.
Free for my eyes, which is cheaper than it was yesterday.
The CDDL is yet another reason why the OSI (started by Perens,
Raymond and others to re-brand Free Software) was a really
bad (and dangerous) idea.
I
The CDDL is yet another reason why the OSI (started by Perens, Raymond and
others to re-brand Free Software) was a really
bad (and dangerous) idea.
I complained to Larry Rosen (who approved CDDL as an OSI-compliant license)
and others about this back at TPOSSCON.
I'm concerned about Free as
Someone mentioned about KDE; I think what may be more likely is the
threads priority. If you check in top for instance, X in one of the
systems was set to nice 0, and one was set to nice -10. I don't
remember which of redhat/mandrake used which. Try changing the nice
values for
No,
Whoever Whatever wrote:
No, it wasn't KDE, I recompiled the kernel with athlon, then ended up
recompling ivtv, lirc and other needed modules, reinstalled nvidia
driver, system came up fast but with no sound. It was pretty good
with very low load average, video not jerky while compiling. I
Agree,
It's good to see them moving this direction, doesn't matter if they
gain or the public gain at the end. You can't expect everyone selling
just service to make their stock holder happy, I never have any bad
experence with them in the past. We used alot of open source product
in our
On Jun 14, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
The CDDL is yet another reason why the OSI (started by Perens,
Raymond and others to re-brand Free Software) was a really bad
(and dangerous) idea.
I complained to Larry Rosen (who approved CDDL as an OSI-
16 matches
Mail list logo
