[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread StefanPotyra
Hi, just subscribed ogra and StevenK. ogra: you've registered the spec in the first place, how do you feel about adding that meta package at this point in the release cycle? I assume this mainly impacts MID? @StevenK: If this mainly impacts MID, then I guess it's your domain ;). Cheers,

[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
In principle adding a metapackage is not a big deal. Do you expect ISO images for lubuntu to be built on Launchpad? Do you have a governance process for deciding what should be in the package? -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this

[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Additionally, the seeds are currently controlled by an open team with 118 members. I do not see this as a recipe for success. -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Mario Behling
Hi, On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugardavid.su...@canonical.com wrote: Lol!  While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise! Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to build a strong and