Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-24 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
Hiyas everybody: I picked another PC to see how is the resource consumption changing depending on the hardware, and the result is this: On a new machine (AMD Turion Dual Core M520, 3GB RAM ~ Lubuntu 10.10) Aqualung 4%CPU 32RAM Deadbeef 4%CPU 25RAM Audacious 4%CPU 17RAM On my old laptop (P3

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
In my machine: Aqualung:28%CPU / 28 Mb Ram Deadbeef:15-17%CPU / 24 Mb Ram Audacious: 9%CPU / 19 Mb Ram (my favourite) For others: Less RAM consumption scenario: Deadbeef 80% CPU usage 23 MB RAM Aqualung50% CPU usage 26 MB RAM Less CPU consumption

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a écrit : But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious compared to these two others is far better. Is there something that i'm missing with this program? I also try audacious, and the result was not so fantastic : CPU

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread David Sugar
I have personally come to love exaile. But this more had to do with Rhythmbox having many additional gnome dependencies, where exaile does not. On the other hand neither is truly lightweight. On 11/15/2010 02:13 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Yorvyk
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:47:18 + Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:13:22 +0100 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a écrit : But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-14 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
Sorry, last line was: System without Audacious running: 86MB System with Audacious running: 93MB -- jpxsat ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 à 20:10 +, Yorvyk a écrit : A quick test of the two, using a two song play list with one each mp3 ogg gave: Deadbeef80% CPU usage 23 MB RAM Aqualung50% CPU usage 26 MB RAM Doing the same test on my testing box : Deadbeef

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-13 Thread Yorvyk
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:39:33 +0100 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 à 23:36 +, Andrew Woodhead a écrit : Deadbeef is the nuts. I can't rate it highly enough :) But you should be more verbose than this if you want to convince us :) A quick test of

[Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi, I worked on the packaging of deadbeef, and I think I'm close to something suitable for upload in official repository. Thanks to the work of the Debian Maintainer and the PPA maintainer. The result will be available in a few minutes in the Lubuntu PPA [1], for Maverick and Natty. It's not a