Le Wednesday 08 June 2011 à 23:26 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
> I've been running Ubuntu Oneiric with lightdm for a while and it
> appears to behave it's self OK.
> Having had a bit of a read about it I don't see an advantage in
> either, from a user's point of view, and I'm a bit lost with the
> te
I'm with whatever our devs choose - they're the ones who have to do the work
:)
Regards,
Phill.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Chris wrote:
> Aloha oukou,
>
> I agree with what Julian said about LightDM, on all mentioned
> (dis)advantages. But the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages
Aloha oukou,
I agree with what Julian said about LightDM, on all mentioned
(dis)advantages. But the advantages should outweigh the disadvantages, as
Ubuntu and Xubuntu even have way more devs hanging around then Lubuntu.
Every error or bug we encounter we can put on launchpad and hopefully will
ge
Julien, just to clarify, LightDM uses 3.2Mb and LXDM 2.3 and not the
other way around? This seems a trivial difference.
You've mentioned before that support is important for a DM as it needs
to be tested across many different configurations. LightDM seems far
more active than LXDM, and in spit
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:39:42 +0200
Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.
>
> LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
> Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
> dependenc
Hi,
I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.
LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
dependency on GNOME.
LightDM has the advantage to split the greeter (the UI part) an
6 matches
Mail list logo
