It's slow for me too. Even in Gnome, when using two or three plugins
it's annoying. Another option could be Scribes. It's a bit strange, but
it has syntax highlighting and doesn't have too much dependencies. But I
don't know if its development status.
--
Go to rafaellaguna.com
Go to
Am Mittwoch 08 Juni 2011, 15:23:56 schrieb 神癒礁湖 (Rafael Laguna):
It's slow for me too. Even in Gnome, when using two or three plugins
it's annoying. Another option could be Scribes. It's a bit strange, but
it has syntax highlighting and doesn't have too much dependencies. But I
don't know if
Hi,
I'd like to clarify my point, why dropping depencies to recommends is a
DRAW/WIN/WIN. There are three groups of people:
1) I like lubuntu / lubuntu-desktop the way it is, please don't tinker around
2) I want another program for my needs than what lubuntu-desktop is proposing
3) I'm low on
Gedit -1, way too slow on my old machines. (P3 and below)
--
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help :
Thanks for all the replies in gedit. I've currently got no machine to test
these things, that's why it was only a proposal. I'll install it myself when
I need to use it.
With metta,
Chris Druif
On Jun 8, 2011 8:03 PM, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com
wrote:
Gedit -1, way too slow on
On 09/06/2011 12:34, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
Why? What is the value of being able to still keep lubuntu-desktop?
Because new packages being added to lubuntu-desktop will be pulled in when it is
upgraded. If you remote lubuntu-desktop, you won't get any of the new additions.
And it can be hard
I've tested every PDF reader and Evince is the only one that does not
distort truetype edges. The respective developments for MuPDF and XPdf
are a bit paused and, as PCMan said, usability increases due to the
user popularity, so it's easy making changes. Evince isn't as resource
hungry as we can
From a very-humble user point of view:
I use Libre Office + Gnumeric (Abiword can't convince me). As i read
recently, Libre Office is getting performance improvements, but the problem
is still the ram consumption vs the ram used by abiword (i use LO for writer
and slideshows, but gnumeric is a
Le Tuesday 07 June 2011 à 09:14 -0400, Tim Bernhard a écrit :
I understand that it's a standard to have games, but the ones we
have look worse than anything I've seen since DOS days! I think they
sort of bring the overall feel of the distro down, but I'm guessing
they are really lightweight.
2. Correct. My mistake.
Cheers,
James Gifford
http://jamesrgifford.com
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:14 PM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Lubuntu is lightweght + good usability. Sometimes usability
should outweigh memory usage if the lighter alternatives are not as
usable, xpdf for example.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:06:28 -0400
Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com wrote:
From a very-humble user point of view:
I use Libre Office + Gnumeric (Abiword can't convince me). As i read
recently, Libre Office is getting performance improvements, but the problem
is still the ram
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:15:16 -0400
Tim Bernhard ohiom...@gmail.com wrote:
The only thing I don't like is the games. (Is there an easy way for me to
remove the games all at once?? I never really looked into it.)
I wanted to remove them (as well as Abiword Gnumeric), but when I tell
Synaptic
what fits their needs and hardware best.
But ATM we need to give the devs room to adjust to the changes at hand.
--- On *Tue, 6/7/11, Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com* wrote:
From: Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Proposed changes to lubuntu-desktop
toddcar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Todd Carnes toddcar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Proposed changes to lubuntu-desktop
To: lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 6:08 PM
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:15:16 -0400
Tim Bernhard ohiom...@gmail.com wrote:
The only thing I
their needs and hardware best.
But ATM we need to give the devs room to adjust to the changes at hand.
--- On *Tue, 6/7/11, Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com* wrote:
From: Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Proposed changes to lubuntu-desktop
To: lubuntu-desktop
Hi,
I'd like to propose some changes to the lubuntu-desktop package. This is
primarily meant to the developers, but other users may be interested.
The point of Lubuntu LXDE is to make a very lightweight desktop to end
users. This proposal would 1) make many of the dependencies as
Just my two cents here - libreoffice is Java based, so (in my
experience anyway) it probably isn't lighter-weight.
You mentioned Midori. In my experience, Midori isn't good for the
average user, and some sites (namely, gmail) refuse to work with it at
all.
Just my two cents, take it for what
1. Lubuntu is lightweght + good usability. Sometimes usability
should outweigh memory usage if the lighter alternatives are not as
usable, xpdf for example. Midori is not stable enough. In addition,
browser is the most critical part of a desktop system and is one of
the largest security hole. A
18 matches
Mail list logo
