> Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to
> build a strong and broad
> community, that can take care of tasks. For example Debian packages that
> have been made
> available during recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and
> released
> to lay t
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugar wrote:
> Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
> have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start
to build a strong and broad community, that can ta
Thank you for the input about the ISO that was tested. As stated the
ISO is not a final release. Some of the changes you suggested have
already been incorporated. Others will be as we go on. We will soon be
uploading a new test iso.
All the best,
Mario
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:49 AM, hagisbashe
i have been running LXDE from a cli install on my Tatung / RM – RTABB12D using
both a genkernel and a custom built onefor quite some time now.
I suggest that you try to minimize any use of gnome libs as possible, use slim
instead of gdm, use Wicd for network as lxnw is too limited right now,aumix
Sounds to me like you are moving in the right direction. +1.
I'll volunteer to do the archive admin review after it's uploaded.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a dir
gah - sorry, wrong bug...
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #545086
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545086
** Also affects: pam (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545086
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: pam (Debia
2009/9/4 David Sugar
> There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for
> community input through the wiki, but not a formal governance process as
> yet,
>
What precisely is required, and how could the LXDE Foundation provide
assistance?
-- A
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desk
Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is
actually very correct. However, the meta package (any meta-package
instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the s
Scott , We are all grown folks and we also understand that David Sugar is
more or less the boss here , There will be no foul play.
Now let's be positive and congratulate everyone on a job well done and wish
everyone a Fantastic week end of whatever tickles your fancy!
Cheers folks! It's POETS.
Additionally, the seeds are currently controlled by an open team with
118 members. I do not see this as a recipe for success.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct
OK. My concern is that there be some agreement on what goes in this
metapackage before it gets approved to go in, so we don't have a lot of
contention afterwards (I'm not saying adjustments won't be needed).
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You r
Scott, it was not anticipated there would be spins hosted on Launchpad
for Lubuntu for Karmic, just the meta package. What happens Karmic +X
though may become a different question.
There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for
community input through the wiki, but not a formal
In principle adding a metapackage is not a big deal. Do you expect ISO
images for lubuntu to be built on Launchpad? Do you have a governance
process for deciding what should be in the package?
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug
Hi,
just subscribed ogra and StevenK. ogra: you've registered the spec in
the first place, how do you feel about adding that meta package at this
point in the release cycle? I assume this mainly impacts MID?
@StevenK: If this mainly impacts MID, then I guess it's your domain ;).
Cheers,
Ste
This really did not get handled correctly at the start of the week as we
were requested to have this in a hurry and then learned after it could
not be sponsored prior to the ffe process. I have put it in revu to
correct any outstanding issue so that it can at least be properly
evaluated.
http://r
15 matches
Mail list logo
