Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] logo

2011-11-17 Thread b g 
This newsletter has become full of things that are minor or even
inconsequential to most of us.

2011/11/17 神癒礁湖 (Rafael Laguna) 

> **
> Of course I'm serious. My priorities, right now, are achieving a perfect
> integration with Ubuntu in almost all aspects of Lubuntu identity,
> including brand marks, colour specs, design lines, advertising (if any),
> social networks presence, etc. Also, a good entrance, such as a good
> website is, could do the downloading process more easy for end-users. In
> case of Lubuntu Team, that's not me, is Canonical who adverted that we must
> be close to them (you can check the design LInes published at
> design.canonical.com).
>
> All of this makes TOO a good distro, not only the code. And I must be
> clear about I'm not deprecating the coder's work, but you must admit that
> design is always the last everybody think in for everything, and that's a
> big mistake. Ok, an icon is a tiny thing, but I'm trying to make the
> Lubuntu image rock solid and homogeneous for three years, with not too much
> success, I must to say.
>
>   --
>   [image: Go to rafaellaguna.com]    
> [image:
> Go to Lubuntu.net] 
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Freedom is not free.
<><><>___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [12.04] Firefox instead of Chromium?

2011-11-09 Thread b g 
This all sounds like personal preference and subjective arguments to me.
 After all, users can install whatever browser they desire.

Personally, I wish Lubuntu would boot as fast as it used to.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:55 AM, A. Andjelkovic wrote:

> Let's not start a war here... I don't want to be rude, but please keep
> such personal opinions out of this discussion.
> I think we can all agree that both Firefox and Chromium are rich in
> features.
> We are simply trying to find out which browser, out of Firefox and
> Chromium, use the least resources.
> We want to chose the lightest of the two to be our out-of-the-box web
> browser, whatever users prefer to use after that is simply an apt-get away.
> Let's not think in terms of "This is what I would prefer" but rather "This
> is what a user on a low spec machine would prefer".
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jeremy Bicha  wrote:
>
>> On 9 November 2011 06:03, Leszek Lesner  wrote:
>>
>> > In my view Chromium offers still better features than firefox. Just look
>> > at the HTML5 capabilities it just beats firefox here with in my view
>> > important things just like HTML5 videoplayback (H264 is supported)
>>
>> Google is dropping H264 support:
>> http://blog.chromium.org/2011/01/html-video-codec-support-in-chrome.html
>>
>> > or the fact that every browser tab in chromium is running as a different
>> > process in a sandbox which makes a crash of one tab not concerning for
>> > other tabs.
>>
>> Firefox might do that in the future also, but it costs memory to
>> sandbox each browser tab. And I believe Chromium cheats: when
>> available memory gets too low, tabs begin sharing the same process so
>> it's a bit harder to know what's really going on.
>>
>> > All in all I am in flavor of Chromium as its still faster and offers the
>> > better features.
>>
>> That's a bit subjective as Firefox also offers unique features: It's
>> possible to run a few hundred tabs in Firefox; the design of
>> Chromium's tabbar makes that much more painful in Chromium. Firefox
>> has a much more powerful addon framework (although Chromium may
>> improve this next year). The user has more control over his data with
>> Firefox Sync than with Google's version.
>>
>> While I'm not a Google-hater, I think it's very important for the free
>> web that Mozilla continues to exist. Since Mozilla is a bit more open
>> than Chromium and multiple steps more open than Android, I think open
>> source fans should consider supporting Firefox if the features are
>> nearly equal, which in my opinion they are. This is why I hope Firefox
>> continues to remain the Ubuntu default browser. Since Lubuntu has
>> different constraints in choosing default apps, I'll let Julien and
>> the Lubuntu devs make their own evaluation. Both browsers are fully
>> supported in Ubuntu (Canonical is looking to hire someone who can help
>> maintain Chromium).
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
>> Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Freedom is not free.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp