, 2010 9:20:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Applications by default: Replace xarchiver by
file-roller
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:35:24 +
Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 03:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Stevo Vukovic stevovuko...@yahoo.com wrote:
-1
Recently, file
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:23:14 +0100
Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 21 November 2010, 11:40:08 schrieb Julien Lavergne:
Hi,
I would like to open the discussion on the archiver.
On my 2 systems using Lubuntu, one of the first thing I do is replacing
xarchiver by
/+bug/386795
From: Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de
To: lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Sent: Sun, November 21, 2010 12:23:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Applications by default: Replace xarchiver by
file-roller
Am Sonntag 21 November 2010, 11:40:08
by default: Replace xarchiver
by file-roller
Hi,
I would like to open the discussion on the archiver.
On my 2 systems using Lubuntu, one of the first thing I do is
replacing
xarchiver by file-roller. For me, the GUI is better and it's easier to
use. There is also no extra GNOME depends
I would like to know if people tested it on a small configuration, to
see if the behavior is also good enough.
Running Lubuntu 10.04 at 760mhz 256Ram File-Roller runs perfect.
--
jpxsat
Ubuntu user #29.157 (Lubuntu 10.04)
Linux user #522.597
___
5 matches
Mail list logo
