, and also we should think more of
the mass, rather than ourselves, it's because we are more experience in
linux, does not mean a normal person who has no experience in linux can
think like us.
Regards
John Thng
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Glen Bizeau wrote:
> I agree,
>
> Kee
, and also we should think more of
> the mass, rather than ourselves, it's because we are more experience in
> linux, does not mean a normal person who has no experience in linux can
> think like us.
>
> Regards
> John Thng
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Glen Bi
text. There are already distro serving the
needs of the minimal disk space dedicated netbook.
Regards
John Thng
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Woodhead <
andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think openoffice is a bad choice, you can easily put this into context:
>
does not care about the usability. I know there are distros
putting lightweight apps, but does it solve the usability problem with
lightweight.
I'm not sure what the big picture is, but lubuntu should be for everyone,
young till old, developed or developing countries, and not too restrictive
to
for
the mass.
There are people who do meta-packages or so. But if I'm not wrong, there
ain't much human resources for this and that atm ya?
Regards
John Thng
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop
will unpack the applications in the cd. In which if this
is the goal, we are going for 50 mb cd space instead, which is impossible if
we want usability.
And also it's a need to cater from donated computers and new computers from
year 2000 and above
6 matches
Mail list logo
