Yes.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Andrew Woodhead <
andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I don't contest the results but can someone explain how a lighter DE uses
> less power? Is it because the CPU is used less so takes less juice?
> Nice article though. KDE is really bloated and the K
Well, in all fairness, KDE has a very specific architectural vision,
starting with things like plasma, etc, and it is not one that had been
focused on minimizing requirements. For people that want those things
KDE offers, thats fine, and that does not seem like bloat to them, I am
sure. I am howe
Am Dienstag, 9. März 2010 14:50:06 schrieb Andrew Woodhead:
> I don't contest the results but can someone explain how a lighter DE uses
> less power? Is it because the CPU is used less so takes less juice?
> Nice article though. KDE is really bloated and the Kubuntu team is quite
> small.
>
> -And
I don't contest the results but can someone explain how a lighter DE uses
less power? Is it because the CPU is used less so takes less juice?
Nice article though. KDE is really bloated and the Kubuntu team is quite
small.
-Andy
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Glen Bizeau wrote:
> I especially l
I especially like the little list at the bottom
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/KDE-a-resource-hog-949634.html
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launch
5 matches
Mail list logo
