+1
Great inspiration Aere :-)
Best regards/Nio
2013-12-16 14:45, David Yentzen skrev:
> @Aere
> Thank you for the detailed reply about developing. You provided some
> great insight for those, like me, that are interested in exploring this
> idea. Time availability is for me is the issue, like
@Aere
Thank you for the detailed reply about developing. You provided some
great insight for those, like me, that are interested in exploring this
idea. Time availability is for me is the issue, like you, I am a bit of an
old timer being 27 years into my career---the thought of switching career
p
Thanks!! That was very inspiring! It is good to nudge people like me
to continue on learning how to do it. I think it was very good advice
to take some working applications you wrote and convert them into other
languages, that is a great idea!
As a side note, are any of you applications ones av
On 12/15/2013 06:27 PM, Israel wrote:
There is no starting place too small or big, I myself am not really a
developer yet, either... I am in the process of learning C++ and
furthering my web dev skills (HTML,CSS,JavaScript), so learning to
program well is the definite place to start.
Getting i
There is no starting place too small or big, I myself am not really a
developer yet, either... I am in the process of learning C++ and
furthering my web dev skills (HTML,CSS,JavaScript), so learning to
program well is the definite place to start.
Getting involved in small projects is a good way
Original Message
Subject:Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any page
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:21:02 -0600
From: David Yentzen
To: Israel
Hi,
I appreciate your thoughtful responses. I discovered QupZilla when
playing around with a min
I have used DuckDuckGo and Ixquick for quite some years now. I try to
encourage otehrs to use it too, they don't confine you to results that
the computer "thinks" you will like.
I think DuckDuckGo is especially nice with the whole ! (bang)
searching. I use that an incredible amount. You can s
I have been using QupZilla daily on both of my Lubuntu netbooks instead of
FF. For daily use, it works great, it is sooo much faster and with a great
deal of functionality. My only observation is the limited number of plug
ins at this time. Otherwise, I really like it and hope it continues to
matur
On 12/15/2013 03:26 PM, Aere Greenway wrote:
> On 12/14/2013 09:29 PM, Israel wrote:
>> This is simply amazing. I think this would make an excellent
>> default... but of course I just downloaded it, and configured it. I
>> will have to do some testing to see what all it can handle, and how
>> fast
On 12/14/2013 09:29 PM, Israel wrote:
This is simply amazing. I think this would make an excellent
default... but of course I just downloaded it, and configured it. I
will have to do some testing to see what all it can handle, and how
fast everything is. With LXQt coming soon... this would be
.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Oops... I meant for that to go to the list. Thanks, Israel! :-)
>>
>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>> ----
>> From: Israel <mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: 12/15/2013 1
y Windows Phone
From: Israel <mailto:israeld...@gmail.com>
Sent: 12/15/2013 11:21 AM
To: Dale Visser <mailto:dale.vis...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any
ops... I meant for that to go to the list. Thanks, Israel! :-)
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> --
> From: Israel
> Sent: 12/15/2013 11:21 AM
> To: Dale Visser
> Subject: Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any page
>
> You replied onl
Oops... I meant for that to go to the list. Thanks, Israel! :-)
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
From: Israel
Sent: 12/15/2013 11:21 AM
To: Dale Visser
Subject: Re: latest chromium-browser using high cpu on any page
You replied only to me...
It has integrated
@Jordan
I was being excited about QupZilla, not Chromium.
I think the thing to offer the choice of browsers would be the ubiquity
installer. I have never looked at what makes up ubiquity, so I have no
idea. I am not even sure what language it was written in.
I don't know what the dev options ar
Hi thanks for the suggestion, it helped me though not directly. I was a
problem with one of the extensions I was using (Vimium).
I created a bug report using ubuntu-bug chromium-browser - and in
process of doing that I looked at the files it attached and then come to
the idea to check the exte
I would hesitate to make Chromium "standard" until the browser is
demonstrated to be compatible with most popular Chrome plug-ins
(especially security plugins.) Sure, Chromium might be a good
alternative for lower spec machines. Still many lubuntu users will end
up removing the Chromium packa
This is simply amazing. I think this would make an excellent default...
but of course I just downloaded it, and configured it. I will have to
do some testing to see what all it can handle, and how fast everything
is. With LXQt coming soon... this would be an excellent addition to the
lineup.
I have never used Midori with Lubuntu so cannot comment on it. FF works
well on my Lubuntu machine but I have been using QupZilla lately. It is
very fast, opening in less than 2 secs and page response it also very
fast. It is lightweight with minimal plug-ins but does all that I need,
you may wish
ubuntu-bug chromium
should report it just fine.
I have found Opera runs very fast on my oldest computers, though it is
proprietary. If you have a REALLY slow computer it makes using the
internet much more plesant, though I would rather it be free and open.
I did a lot of testing of all the web b
Hi,
since last update of chromium-browser on Lubuntu 13.10 the CPU usage is
very high with any open page:
Version 31.0.1650.63 Ubuntu 13.10 (31.0.1650.63-0ubuntu0.13.10.1~20131204.1)
Task Manager (lxde)
Command User CPU% RSS VM-Size
chro root 27% 222.0 MB 1.3 GB
chromium-browser user 11% 72.
21 matches
Mail list logo
