Chris,
Sorry, if you took my comments about pain of porting personally. That
wasn't my intension.
+1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been doing this for a
lot longer than I have, but I didn't understand you pain until I had to go
through it personally. :P
Have you looked at Contrib in a while? There's a lot of projects that are
in Java's Contrib that are not in
My english isn't enough to understand this answer. I hope it is not related
with
employee-employer relationship as in the past.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:08 AM
To:
Chris,
Now that you have spent some time dealing with the porting what is your view
on creating a fully automated porting tool?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:23 PM
To:
Next to impossible/really, really hard. There are just some things that
don't map quite right. Sharpen is great, but it seems you need to code
written in a way that makes it easily convertible, and I don't see the
folks at Lucene changing their coding style to do that.
An example: 3.0.3 changes
Lucene locks directory with index after network related problems
Key: LUCENENET-457
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-457
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type:
