Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

On 2011-11-20, Prescott Nasser wrote: > I've updated the files - same location Thanks a lot! Hashes and sigs are good. All required legal files are in place. src zip still matches the tag (so I didn't have to re-run RAT) +1 Stefan

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

I've updated the files - same location ~P > From: bode...@apache.org > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:34:16 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

ucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 +1 for wiki checklist & ticket for for build scripts to bundle all this stuff for you. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Damn It - knew i was missing someth

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

t; Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34 PM > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Third time is the charm: > > I'm afraid it is not. > > > ht

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

Damn It - knew i was missing something Sent from my Windows Phone From: Stefan Bodewig Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34 PM To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Third time is the charm: I'm afraid it is not. > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ Sigs and hashes are good. Source zip and tag match except for the build/lib/doc dirs that are only inside the tag and which I agree is a g

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

ll' does not exist in the project > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Should I be passing a command line argument to build all? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------- > > > Date: M

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

to build all? > > > > > > > > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:39:30 -0400 > > From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-inc

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:17:20 -0800 > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > > > So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the > > source code,

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

31 Oct 2011 16:39:30 -0400 > From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > @Troy, > > Now I don't feel as bad for my long e-mails. ;) > > -build scripts > > Exce

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

0800 > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the > source code, and noticed something that we should probably discuss > before votin

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the source code, and noticed something that we should probably discuss before voting on the artifacts. The files in Contrib\Analyzers are nowhere near in sync with 2.9.4... Not sure how old they are exactly, but they are very diffe

[Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3

Third time is the charm: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ I'll keep it open for 72 hours or so, then if all goes well, I'll make a vote to the general@incubator Thanks everyone for their help getting to this point. ~Prescott +1

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

@Troy, Now I don't feel as bad for my long e-mails. ;) -build scripts Except for building on mono or running NCover, the scripts work as intended. Also end users would need to install the required tools they intend to run with the build scripts. The scripts can be included, but it would be wise

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

--- > > From: bode...@apache.org > > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:00:08 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > > > On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote: > I have to re tag the trunk because of the additional bug fix I put in > this evening. So feel free to update the trunk LUCENENET-451 Technically I could commit it myself but it may be better if anybody from "the real team" did. Stefan

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Stefan - doc folder was left out intentionally for this reason. OK. I wonder whether it should be moved out of trunk. > Also the Lib folder, I left out, I thought it was additional dll's > that weren't part of Lucene that others might need. I can put that

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

and get it in there. > From: bode...@apache.org > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:00:08 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Artifacts are loca

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

pache.org > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:10:46 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > On 2011-10-31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > The only other test I'd perform was running RAT which I'll do shortly > > and post the

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

On 2011-10-31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > The only other test I'd perform was running RAT which I'll do shortly > and post the results here. The binary look good, but Way too many files without license headers. I can and will provide a pa

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

om: bode...@apache.org > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:00:08 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Artifacts are located here: > > http://people.apache.org/~p

Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Artifacts are located here: > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC1/ Is there a tag in svn that is supposed to correspond to them? My guess is . But then I find

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

+1 > From: geobmx...@hotmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:08:32 -0700 > Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating > > > Artifacts are located here: > http://pe

[Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating

Artifacts are located here: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC1/ If the vote passes here, I will move the artifacts to staging and call a vote on the general incubator mailing list Please verify the release and cast your vote. The vote will be open for 72 ho