with Lucene.Net as is.
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:42:03 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Regarding the short term goals that Scott mentioned, I agree. I think
over
Welcome to SF!
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:05:16 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Yes, a lot of it is done. Porting highlighter is partially done, not
committed, because
!
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:05:16 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Yes, a lot of it is done. Porting highlighter is partially done, not
committed, because it relies on the memory contrive package in java,
which
5:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go through it personally. :P
Have you
From: Scott Lombard
Sent: 11/22/2011 8:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Mike,
You're right about putting together a higher level discussion. Here are
the
road map items I see. I am interested in other have to say.
None of the items I have listed
On 2011-11-22, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
With the 4.0 release we
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
I just sent that vote email out - do you want me to update?
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
I just sent that vote email
In the same vain: sort out the build process in a way that doesn't
require the tools to be checked into svn.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Road+Map
Posting these under floating goals on wiki. I already have some ideas on
how this can be done, so I've linked the above
11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4 trunk as the base for the 3.0.3 branch, but I looked to the
code in 2.9.4g as a reference for many things, particularly the Support
classes. We hit many of the same issues I'm sure, I moved some
.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4 trunk as the base for the 3.0.3 branch, but I looked to the
code
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
To clarify, it wasn't as much *difficult* as it was more *painful*. Above,
I was inferring that it was more difficult that the rest of the code, which
by comparison was easier. It wasn't painless to try and map where code
changes were from the java classes
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go through it personally. :P
Have you looked at Contrib in a while? There's a lot
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go
14 matches
Mail list logo