I did an initial run of Lucene 3.0.2 through Sharpen. It stops when there is
an error or finds something it doesn't have a mapping for. I added some
placeholder mappings so it would at least get through a few files.
Here is a package of what I have so far:
http://convid.com/alex/lucene/Lucene.Net.
George,
I await your list of actionable tasks but I wanted to zero in on your
remarks about deltas. If we did a 2.9.3 release, would it be reasonable to
take our current 2.9.2 and do commit-per-commit porting from the java to get
there? What about 3.0.2? Could it be done commit-per-commit or would
I don't think Lucene.Net staying a line-by-line port is craziness. We're not
saying that Lucene.Net is the one true implementation and there can be no
others. I see Lucene.Net as part of a spectrum of solutions.
On one end of the spectrum is IKVM. If you want all the java lucene features
immedi
Thanksgiving did slow me down, so there is hope.
On another note, are there any committers that are still interested in
committing? If there aren't, obviously that's a major roadblock. Can we
create new committers relatively soon?
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx..
I'm willing to be a committer as well.
I agree the entire porting process needs to be publicly documented and much
of the dev effort (at least initially) will be in this area.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 30,
sh a list of
initial committers.
So far, the following people have come forward and offered to be committers
(in alphabetical order):
Alex Thompson
Ben Martz
Chris Currens
Heath Aldrich
Michael Herndon
Prescott Nasser
Scott Lombard
Simone Chiaretta
Troy Howard
I would like to place an open reques
Maybe we could just bug-fix support the current 2.9.2 codebase unless people
really need something in 2.9.x
I think there would be a 3.0.x line-by-line port and a 3.0.x idiomatic
version.
I'd like to throw another idea into the mix which is perhaps the idiomatic
version could be created by an aut
a Sharpen conversion Alex Thompson did in November:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12459581/Lucene.Net.Sharpen
20101114.zip
>From my understanding there was no pre/post processing done. I also believe
it's 2.9.2, not 3.0.3 as Digy's are.
Here is the JIRA issue for the a
I agree some things will fall outside of the pure syntax mapping of a
conversion but I think its possible to have a more integrated pre/post than
the patch workflow laid out below.
First a little background on the internals of sharpen, which uses an
abstract syntax tree(AST) approach. Overall it
What if you use the windows character map to paste in the actual character
you want?
buffer.charAt( c ) == 'ΓΌ';
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:55 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Umlauts as Char
I'm using Eclipse 3.4.2 (ganymede-SR2) for Java EE. You need a Java EE
edition to build plugins. I haven't tried the Helios versions.
The repository is SVN not CVS so you need an SVN plugin (regular windows
TortoiseSVN had some problems). I use Subclipse http://subclipse.tigris.org/
and that gives
Hey All,
The discussion on Sharpen or other porting tools has been quiet so I think
its time for a vote. Background info here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
I propose forking Sharpen outside of ASF for use in our conversion and any
other java project.
The company that crea
If we were just doing small discrete patches it would be fine to give them a
try but I think we are looking at taking the project in a new direction. Our
work will be experimental for a while so its easier to play around in a
fresh repository than convince them to commit something that partially
wo
On sharpen, I was waiting to hear back on the legal stuff of forking and
fell off the grid for a while. Did we ever figure things out with that?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:12 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache
Hey guys its been a while since I was active on the project but it seems
we're still in the same old debate so I'll throw my two cents in.
I'm for a line by line port for the reasons already mentioned by others. I
won't reiterate them.
I was working with Sharpen a while back and I have a few thou
Jumping back into this debate... I still feel that automated porting is the
fastest way to get up to date and stay up to date.
So to that effect I finally got rolling on a fork of Sharpen which I have
made public here:
https://github.com/pierogitus/Grindstone
I've been using java Lucene 3.5 as my
Are you sure built it and exported to the correct folder?
The line numbers in the stack trace don't match up to the latest version.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 4:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sub
No never had a memory error.
I see it does get up to about 500MB but I got 12GB in my system and it
finishes in a minute flat.
If I take out the test folders from the conversion it only gets to 300MB.
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926677#action_12926677
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-373:
-
Have you tried changing the def
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Thompson updated LUCENENET-380:
Attachment: Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip
Attached Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101104.zip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931608#action_12931608
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
yes i'll try to make prog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Thompson updated LUCENENET-380:
Attachment: Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip
Lucene.Net.Sharpen20101114.zip is a full run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932854#action_12932854
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
George,
Can you post your setup,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Thompson updated LUCENENET-380:
Attachment: Lucene.Net.3_0_3_Sharpen20110106.zip
Uploaded Lucene.Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998172#comment-12998172
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
Looks like NGit does the pre/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998181#comment-12998181
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
I saw db40 did accept a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998626#comment-12998626
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
That's worth a shot I gue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009794#comment-13009794
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
Yes we already knew the fork w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010206#comment-13010206
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
My thoughts on the fork have
29 matches
Mail list logo
