It'd be useful if There was a StopAnalyzer ctor overload that took an
IEnumerable and maybe the current one that takes List should
be ICollection (same as internal stopWords member).
Just gives a little flexibility on the types that can be used.
Also there is a little confusion around the treatmen
at is in dist is the release.
> I
> > will check out the tag tonight
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> >
> > From: Andy Pook
> > Sent: 2/27/2012 5:09 AM
> > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject:
If we don't want to add IEnumerable (though it seems that IEnumerable could
be added in parallel with the existing pattern) could we add a bunch of
extension methods?
Something like the following...
{noformat}
public static class LuceneExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable GetEnumerable(this Term
4 "hides inherited member"
This can lead to some weird consequences esp. if polymorphism is used.
Added 'override' is almost always the right solution.
I would consider these as fairly serious smells.I can't see any reason why
we should not fix these at this stage. I can provide patches if the
committers are interested.
--Andy Pook
ailing list to send mails. Otherwise I'll have to
do a allow/deny confirmation (as a moderator) with every mail you send and
it can get lost among spams.
DIGY
On 18 February 2010 10:35, Andy Pook wrote:
>
> We get a lot of compiler warnings. This has been discussed before and the
&g
Attributes are a great thing from the indexing side of things. What
I'd really like to be able to do is find a document. Then be able to
retrieve the attributes for each field.
We are considering storing some custom attributes against some of the
"tokens" in a field. But we would like to be able to
ignore the
"word"s.
I hope this is more coherent :)
Thanks.
On 26 February 2010 18:40, Michael Garski wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Can you give a bit more information on what you are looking to do? I
> don't quite understand what you are looking to do.
>
> Michael
>
&g
Oops, my bad. I'll continue there
On 27 February 2010 18:26, Michael Garski wrote:
> Andy,
>
> FYI - I moved this thread to the user list as it applies to the use rather
> than development of Lucene.Net.
>
> Michael
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: An
I've noticed another compiler warning that can be easier avoided...
Search\Function\CustomScoreQuery.cs(207,25): warning CS0108: 'Lucene.Net.Sear
ch.Function.CustomScoreQuery.AnonymousCustomScoreProvider.reader' hides inherit
ed member 'Lucene.Net.Search.Function.CustomScoreProvider.reader'. Use
Sounds like a dumb question...
Windows Explorer does not recognise it as a VS solutions file. The
icon has the VS symbol (lower right) but not the version number
(usually top right).
Using File|Open in VS shows the Conversion wizard. The report at the
end says that it has converted Lucene.Net.cspr
email (one for the CustomScoreProvider &
> one for the .bat files).
>
> Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Pook [mailto:andy.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:20 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: More compiler warnings.
&
the Lucene.Net project in the solution as
> opposed to an assembly reference, and it will convert the Lucene.Net
> project to a VS2008 project when it opens.
>
> Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Pook [mailto:andy.p...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10
rate pain that George has done previously? Is that still the plan?
2010/3/10 Digy :
> There was a disccusion on these warnings previously.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-202 .
>
> DIGY.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Pook [mailto:andy.p...@gmai
Is 2.9.2 done? Should there be a new 2.9.2 tag? Is there anything left to
do? Is there anything we non-committers can help with?
We're using trunk r930561 without issues (though we're fairly
unsophisticated).
What's the current thinking for what's next?
Cheers,
Andy
+1
On 4 May 2010 20:43, Leonardo Azize Martins wrote:
> Hi DIGY,
>
> I think it is a good choice.
> I do not know how can I help, but I would like.
>
> Regards,
> Leo
>
>
>
> 2010/5/4 Digy
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Issues related with lucene.Java 2.9.3
> > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC
: Bug
Reporter: Andy Pook
Priority: Minor
Making these two methods protected (as per Java version) allows a port of the
BalancedSegmentMergePolicy from the Zoie project
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-390:
Attachment: LUCENENET-390.patch
apply to "src" directory of either 2.9.2 branc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook closed LUCENENET-390.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Oops, I was looking at trunk. (Changed in r1025577 20/10/2010)
As the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991425#comment-12991425
]
Andy Pook commented on LUCENENET-391:
-
A much appreciated work. I had
Reporter: Andy Pook
Priority: Minor
Using the more abstract type makes creating custome Fieldables easier as they
can use other TextReader descendants (such as StringReader).
Internally the main use seems to be from DocInverterPerField (eg line 125)
where it is used via a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-340:
Attachment: LUCENENET-340-Filedable.ReaderValue.patch
Fieldable and implimenters patched
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-340:
Attachment: LUCENENET-340-Fieldable.ReaderValue-r911211.patch
nothing changed other than taking
Fix "Compiler warnings to worry about"
--
Key: LUCENENET-341
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-341
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-341:
Attachment: LUCENENET-341-SupportClass.ThreadClass.patch
Add GetHashCode method
Fixes CS0661
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-341:
Attachment: LUCENENET-341-Term.patch
LUCENENET-341-NumericRangeQuery.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835832#action_12835832
]
Andy Pook commented on LUCENENET-341:
-
Changing ISerializable ctors to private
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837321#action_12837321
]
Andy Pook commented on LUCENENET-343:
-
A lot of this is covered by the patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-343:
Attachment: TextReader-2.9.2.patch
TextReader-2.9.2.patch adds the additional fixes suggested
Avoidable compiler warning
--
Key: LUCENENET-348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-348
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Andy Pook
Compiler warning that can be easier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Pook updated LUCENENET-348:
Attachment: CustomScoreQuery.patch
remove reader member. So use inherited member from ancestor
30 matches
Mail list logo
