I am trying to do some filtering and rearrangement of search result. Two
possiblity come into mind are iterating though the Hits or making custom
HitCollector.
All documentation invaribly warn about the performance impact of using
HitCollector with large result set. The scenario that google
On Dec 10, 2004, at 7:39 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I am still in delima on How to use the HitCollector for returning
Hits hits
between scores 0.2f to 1.0f ,
There is not a simple example for the same, yet lot's of talk on usage
for
the same on the form.
1) I am not 100% sure about
Message-
From: Vikas Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 3:17 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: HITCOLLECTOR+SCORE+DELIMA
On Dec 10, 2004, at 7:39 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I am still in delima on How to use the HitCollector for returning
Hits hits
between scores
of 'Contents'
from various Html documents
Please Advise me
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 5:05 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: HITCOLLECTOR+SCORE+DELIMA
On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:16 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
So u
On Dec 13, 2004, at 6:58 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
Iterate over Hits. returns large hit values and Iteration on Hits
for
scores consumes time ,
so How Do I Limit my Search Between [ X.xf to Y.yf ] prior getting the
Hits.
Why do you need to do this *prior* to getting Hits?
You have yet to justify
On Dec 13, 2004, at 11:16 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
time [ A simple search of 'handbags' returned 1,60,000 hits and time
taken
was 440 secs ,in production Env / May be our
Coding is poor,But we are constantly improving the process ].
If your searches are taking 440 seconds, you have something
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:44 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: HITCOLLECTOR+SCORE+DELIMMA
On Dec 13, 2004, at 11:16 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
time [ A simple search of 'handbags' returned 1,60,000 hits and time
taken
was 440 secs ,in production Env / May be our
Coding
On Dec 14, 2004, at 5:42 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
What exactly do u mean by this
We've emphasized numerous times that calling hits.doc(i) is a resource
hit. Don't do it for documents you aren't going to show. To filter
by
score, use hits.score(i) first.
I am bit Confused u mean to say Replace
On Dec 13, 2004, at 1:16 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
So u say I have to Build a Filter to Collect all the Scores between
the 2
Ranges [ 0.2f to 1.0f]
My message is being misinterpreted. I said filter as a verb, not a
noun. :) In other words, I was not intending to mean write a Filter -
a Filter
: HITCOLLECTOR+SCORE+DELIMMA
On Dec 13, 2004, at 6:58 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
Iterate over Hits. returns large hit values and Iteration on Hits
for
scores consumes time ,
so How Do I Limit my Search Between [ X.xf to Y.yf ] prior getting the
Hits.
Why do you need to do this *prior* to getting Hits
: HITCOLLECTOR+SCORE+DELIMA
On Dec 10, 2004, at 7:39 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I am still in delima on How to use the HitCollector for returning
Hits hits
between scores 0.2f to 1.0f ,
There is not a simple example for the same, yet lot's of talk on usage
for
the same on the form.
Unfortunately
Hi guys
Apologies.
I am still in delima on How to use the HitCollector for returning Hits hits
between scores 0.2f to 1.0f ,
There is not a simple example for the same, yet lot's of talk on usage for
the same on the form.
Please somebody spare a bit of code (u'r intelligence
On Dec 10, 2004, at 7:39 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I am still in delima on How to use the HitCollector for returning
Hits hits
between scores 0.2f to 1.0f ,
There is not a simple example for the same, yet lot's of talk on usage
for
the same on the form.
Unfortunately there isn't a clean way
Hello
Please somebody explain me how to use the HitCollector on a simple
Searcher.search(query) to obtain score range between 1.0f and 0.02456f.
Thx in advance
WITH WARM REGARDS
HAVE A NICE DAY
[ N.S.KARTHIK
The HitCollector-based search API is not meant to work remotely. To do
so would involve an RPC-callback for every non-zero score, which would
be extremely expensive. Also, just making HitCollector serializable
would not be sufficient. You'd also need to pass in a HitCollector
implementation
There should be a comment about this best practice in the API/Javadocs.
Manfred
The HitCollector-based search API is not meant to work remotely. To do
so would involve an RPC-callback for every non-zero score, which would
be extremely expensive. Also, just making HitCollector serializable
16 matches
Mail list logo
