Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options to
solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
fields and QueryParser?
I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
QueryParser that should deal this problems.
I'm just a
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was
indexed though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a
general-purpose QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide
Users List
Subject: Null or no analyzer
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection of Analyzer's during query parsing
i have three field in my index db_id, full_text, subject
all three are indexed, however while indexing I specified to lucene to
index db_id and subject
AFIK if the term Election 2004 will be between quotation marks this should
work fine.
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran
: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field
(keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I
that the query parser is already geared up to do
regards
Rupinder
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 October 2004 16:29
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Null or no analyzer
On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Aviran wrote:
AFIK if the term Election 2004
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token
List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field (keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I guess he has to write an identity analyzer
, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field (keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection of Analyzer's during query parsing
i have three field in my index db_id, full_text, subject
all three are indexed, however while indexing I specified to lucene to
index db_id and subject but not tokenize them
I want to give a single search
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Rupinder Singh Mazara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:23 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Null or no analyzer
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection
14 matches
Mail list logo