Bill Janssen wrote:
I'm not sure this solution is very robust
Thanks, but I'm pretty sure it *is* robust. Can you please offer a
specific critique? Always happy to learn and improve :-).
Try to see the behavior if you want to have a single term query
juat something like: robust
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting:
java.io.IOException: Lock obtain timed out
I have
a writer service that opens the index to delete and add docs. I have a reader
service that opens the index for searching only.
AFAIK you should never open an IndexWriter and an IndexReader at the
same time.
before scewing tomcat too much...
1.make it sure both indexing and reading processes use the same locking
directory (i.e. set it explicitly, take a look in wiky how to)
2. try to execute queries from command line and see what happends
3. in case your queries use sorting, there is a memory leak
Christoph Kiehl writes:
AFAIK you should never open an IndexWriter and an IndexReader at the
same time. You should use only one of them at a time but you may open as
many IndexSearchers as you like for searching.
You cannot open an IndexSearcher without opening an IndexReader (explicitly
Hi,
I'm new using lucene.
I downloaded lucene 1.4.2 and added the 2 jar files to the
classpath.
Executing the demos as a bat file (Windows) is working fine, but
using lucene as a web 'application' is not working ...
Since I'm using netbeans, I startup the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
before scewing tomcat too much...
A little late but probably good advice thankfully it hasn't gone wrong
1.make it sure both indexing and reading processes use the same locking
directory (i.e. set it explicitly, take a look in wiky how to)
working on this not so
You want version 1.4.2, not version 1.4.
The website makes it hard to find 1.4.2, because the mirrors have not been updated yet.
Get 1.4.2 here: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/lucene/v1.4.2/
My queries do use sorting! So I have placed the 1.4 final jar onto my
classpath and have started
A quick pointer..
What you want to look at is using a stemming implementation. Look, for
example, at the FAQ and docs related to the PorterStemFilter and writing
A customer analyzer
(http://lucene.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/faq/faqmanager.cgi?file=chapter.index
ingtoc=faq#q17).
There is a lot of
I am having this same problem, but cannot find any help!
I have a keyword field that sometimes includes double quotes, but I am unable to
search for that field because the escape for a quote doesnt work!
I have tried a number of things:
myfield:lucene is \cool\
AND
myfield:lucene is
Have you tried making a term query by hand and testing to see if it works?
Term t = new Term(field, this is a \test\);
PhraseQuery pq = new PhraseQuery(t);
...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:02:48 -0400, Will Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having this same problem, but cannot find any help!
Hi Terry,
I know this is an old message on the list but it does not look like
anyone responded to your request. I had to do negative boosting for my
search functionality as well so I'd like to share the modification to
QueryParser.jj to make it work. Find your Boost TOKEN and change it
to:
Boost
On Oct 28, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Justin Swanhart wrote:
Have you tried making a term query by hand and testing to see if it
works?
Term t = new Term(field, this is a \test\);
PhraseQuery pq = new PhraseQuery(t);
That's not accurate API, but add you used pq.add(t), it still would
presume that text
I am using a NullAnalyzer for this field.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Searching for a phrase that contains quote character
On Oct 28, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Justin Swanhart
On Thursday 28 October 2004 19:03, Justin Swanhart wrote:
Have you tried making a term query by hand and testing to see if it
works?
Term t = new Term(field, this is a \test\);
PhraseQuery pq = new PhraseQuery(t);
That's not a proper PharseQuery, it searches for *one*
term this is a test
On Thursday 28 October 2004 15:01, Willy De Waele wrote:
Executing the demos as a bat file (Windows) is working fine, but
using lucene as a web 'application' is not working ...
I think that Search.jhtml is totally outdated, please try src/jsp instead.
Regards
Daniel
--
If I have a document set of 10,000 docs and my merge factor is 1000, for
every 1000 documents, Lucene creates a new segment. By the time Lucene
indexes 4500 documents, index will have 4000 documents on the disk and
index for 500 documents is stored in memory. How can I search against
this index at
I've made a few passive mentions of my Lucene
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene Desktop prototype here on PeerFear
in the last few days and I'm amazed how much feedback I've had. People
really want to start work on an Open Source desktop search based on
Lucene.
You'll have to run tests but it shouldn't. All it does is change the
NUMBER token to accept an optional - in front of a number. So,
existing queries with no negative numbers should not be impacted.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:50:47 -0400, Terry Steichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason,
absolutely correct. sorry about that. shouldn't code before coffee :)
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:16:16 +0200, Daniel Naber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 October 2004 19:03, Justin Swanhart wrote:
Have you tried making a term query by hand and testing to see if it
works?
Term
On Oct 28, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Will Allen wrote:
I am using a NullAnalyzer for this field.
Which means that each field is added exactly as-is as a single term?
Then trying the PhraseQuery directly is a good first step - if you can
get that to work then you can move on to making QueryParser work
The nullanalyzer overrides the isTokenChar method to simply return true in the
tokenizer class (http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=1703655).
The situation is that it seems lucene does not expect you to escape characters that
exist inside of a quoted string. So my search
I have a need to search an index for documents that were taken ffrom
particulars files in the filesystem.
Each document in the index has a field named url that is created
using:
doc.add(Field.Text(url, urlStr));
I understand this is both stored and indexed.
My search works if I do
On Friday 29 October 2004 00:22, Bill Tschumy wrote:
I get zero hits. Why are these not equivalent? I think it has
something to do with the fact that the url needs to be quoted so I
search for an exact match.
When you manually build the query there's no need to have quotes around it.
Can you
I have tried that and it doesn't work either. I have also tried using
a PhraseQuery rather than TermQuery.
On Oct 28, 2004, at 5:29 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Friday 29 October 2004 00:22, Bill Tschumy wrote:
I get zero hits. Why are these not equivalent? I think it has
something to do with
Thanks to the recent changes (see CVS) in TermFreqVector support we can now make use
of term offset information held
in the Lucene index rather than incurring the cost of re-analyzing text to highlight
it.
I have created a class ( see http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/TokenSources.java )
Try to see the behavior if you want to have a single term query
juat something like: robust .. and print out the query string ...
Sure, that works fine. For instance, if you have the three default
fields title, authors, and contents, the one-word search
robust expands to
title:foobar
Lets say I have an index with two documents. They both have the same
score but one was added 6 months ago and the other was added 2 minutes ago.
I want the score adjusted based on the age so that older documents have
a lower score.
I don't want to sort by document age (date) because if one
Hi,
We are very interested in highlighting, but haven't gotten around
to reviewing the state of the highlighting mechanisms.
Could someone possibly give me the big picture on highlighting?
What code is available?
How does it work?
What are the current issues?
Many thanks,
Fred
At 07:16 PM
Hi Guys
Apologies.
Can some body provide approximate Statics about the following factor for
Developement and Deployment of Lucene [ it may be usefull for Pro's
Developers ]
a) Creation Indexing
1) X [ Say 100 Million ] of number of documents Y [ Kilobytes ]
with
Mark,
Thanks to the recent changes (see CVS) in TermFreqVector
support we can now make use of term offset information held
in the Lucene index rather than incurring the cost of
re-analyzing text to highlight it.
I have created a class ( see
30 matches
Mail list logo
