Hi all,
Does anyone know what's the performance cost of a Nutch like proximity query
that looks like this: (+Hello +World +\Hello world\~p^a)x ? or just how
in general how much processing does proximity add to a query?
Thanks,
Anson
Depending on what MySQL Full-text search support you probably will lose some
of the advance things you get for free from Lucene, such as proximity
search, wildcard search, search term and search field boosting, scoring of
the documents, etc.
Afterall it depends on what you need to do. In our dev
:43 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: speeding up lucene search
In general, yes.
By splitting up a large index into smaller indicies, you are
linearizing the search time.
Furthermore, that allows you to make your search distributable.
-John
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:00:28 +1000, Anson Lau [EMAIL
]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:52 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Weighting database fields
On Jul 21, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Anson Lau wrote:
Apply boost factor to fields when you do a lucene search.
Or... set the boost on the Field during indexing.
Erik
Anson
-Original
Hello guys,
What are some general techniques to make lucene search faster?
I'm thinking about splitting up the index. My current index has approx 1.8
million documents (small documents) and index size is about 550MB. Am I
likely to get much gain out of splitting it up and use a
If you don't mind hacking the source:
In Hits.java
In method getMoreDocs()
// Comment out the following
//float scoreNorm = 1.0f;
//if (length 0 scoreDocs[0].score 1.0f) {
// scoreNorm = 1.0f / scoreDocs[0].score;
//}
// And just set scoreNorm to 1.
int
Hi,
When I did some load testing on a lucene powered search app, using a
pool of index searchers doesn't give me any more search per second
than just using a singleton index searcher.
Anson
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have multiple threads reading an index. Should they all be
using
--- Anson Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
What's the recommended way of using IndexSearcher? Should
IndexSearcher be a
singleton or pooled? Would pooling provide a more scalable solution
by
allowing you to decide how many IndexSearcher to use based on say how
many
CPU u have
Hi Guys,
What's the recommended way of using IndexSearcher? Should IndexSearcher be a
singleton or pooled? Would pooling provide a more scalable solution by
allowing you to decide how many IndexSearcher to use based on say how many
CPU u have on ur server?
Thanks,
Anson
I hope this helps. Somebody else will probably be able to give more
information, but this should get you started while you wait.
Otis
--- Anson Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Lets say I want to search the term hello world over 3 fields with
different boost:
((hello:field1
Thanks Erik I'll give that a try.
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 7:28 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: a list of matching search term
On Jun 1, 2004, at 9:19 PM, Anson Lau wrote:
Further to my previous email
Hi All,
Eg. Lets say someone do a search on the terms 'apple orange banana'.
In the search results, is it possible to find out for each hit, which of
those terms did match?
Ie. The document with the highest score has all three words so the matching
terms are all of those words.
A lesser
Further to my previous email: The highlighter package should be able to pick
up the matching search terms. Can some experienced highlighter package
users tell me if I should look down that line?
Thanks a lot.
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Anson Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Hi all,
Is it possible to set different boost factor to different fields when you do
a search, rather than when you index?
Thanks,
Anson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I think I found it in Query API...
Thanks,
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Anson Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: field boost factor
Hi all,
Is it possible to set different boost factor to different fields when you do
Hi All,
Our company is looking for 2 java developer with strong Lucene
experience to do some contract work. We're in Sydney, Australia.
If anyone is interested plesaes email me direct
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Thanks,
Anson
-
To
bites maybe we can talk about telecommuting the occasional
day
trip?
Esmond Pitt FACS
0400 139 869
- Original Message -
From: Anson Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:23 AM
Subject: looking for developer
Hi All,
Our company is looking for 2
Ops - sorry should reply to Esmond direct. Pls ignore the previous msg.
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Anson Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:29 PM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: RE: looking for developer
Esmond,
Thanks a lot for your email
RBP,
I'm implementing a search engine for a project at work. It's going to
index approx 1.5 rows in a database.
I am trying to get a feel of what my options are when scalability
becomes an issue. I also want to know if those options require me to
implement my app in a different way right from
I'm trying to see what are some common ways to scale lucene onto
multiple boxes. Is RMI based search and using a MultiSearcher the
general approach?
There doesn't seem to be many articles on the web on how to implement a
lucene search cluster. If anyone knows a good article can you please
post
Further on this topic - has anyone tried implementing a distributed
search with Lucene? How does it work and does it work well?
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Hamish Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:24 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene
Hi All,
I'm a beginner with Lucene. I would like to know if there are general
guidelines on:
1. the number of field a document can have
2. size of unindexed fields
3. size of a stored text field
I just want to get a feel for what are the good practices.
Thanks,
Anson Lau
22 matches
Mail list logo
