The CVS version of Lucene has a patch that allows one to use a
'Compound Index' instead of the traditional one. This reduces the
number of open files. For more info, see/make the Javadocs for
IndexWriter.
Interesting option. Do you have a rough idea of what the performance
impact of using
A very rough and simple 'add a single document to the index' test shows
that the Compound Index is marginally slower than the traditional one.
I did not test searching.
Otis
--- Eric Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CVS version of Lucene has a patch that allows one to use a
'Compound Index'
Tate Avery wrote:
You might have trouble with too many open files if you set your mergeFactor too high. For example, on my Win2k, I can go up to mergeFactor=300 (or so). At 400 I get a too many open files error. Note: the default mergeFactor of 10 should give no trouble.
Please note that it is
Hi,
Wonder if anyone can help. Has anyone used Lucene on a Windows environment?
Anyone know of any documentation specifically focused on doing that?
Or anyone know of any gotchas to avoid?
Thanks for any help,
Cheers Steve.
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
Wonder if anyone can help. Has anyone used Lucene on a Windows
environment?
Anyone know of any documentation specifically focused on doing that?
Or anyone know of any gotchas to avoid?
Yup, used Lucene on Windows lots
(and 200). So, I am using 100.
Tate
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 20, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene on Windows
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
Wonder
Have anyone successfully make LARM crawler integrate with Lucene on Windows
2000 platform? Thank you.
