Right, left.
--- Leo Galambos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Rishabh Bajpai wrote:
>
> > also, i rememebr readin somewhere that one had to build the index
> in
> > some special way, but since you say no; i will take that. i anyways
> dont
> > rememebr where I read it, so no poin
lication can do
so easily.
HTH,
Terry
- Original Message -
From: "Leo Galambos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Wildchar based search?? |
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, R
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Rishabh Bajpai wrote:
> also, i rememebr readin somewhere that one had to build the index in
> some special way, but since you say no; i will take that. i anyways dont
> rememebr where I read it, so no point asking about something if I am
> myself not sure
I remember only
and where can i find the relevant
>> documentation pertaining to them?
>
>Why do you think there are bugs in the first place? Have you
>encountered any bugs?
>
>> 3) Is there some specific way in which the indexes are to be built,
>> for them to return wildchar based
On Saturday 01 February 2003 00:19, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > 1) to what extent are wildcards supported by lucenes?
>
> You can use * and ? the way they usually are used.
I think there was one exception; first character of a simple term
can not be a wildcard? (this from query syntax page).
-+ T
ugs?
> 3) Is there some specific way in which the indexes are to be built,
> for them to return wildchar based search results? I believe there is
> but i am not sure where to look for that information.
No, nothing special needs to be done.
Otis
> thanks
> Rishabh
>
>
&g
based search results? I believe there is but i am not sure where to look for
that information.
thanks
Rishabh
--
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:19:11
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>The thread more suited for lucene-user.
>
>I think that's just a bad work to be indexingMicrosoft...she
