then. So I would expect the answer
to your question to be no.
--
Ian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello,
This is from a thread from about 2 weeks ago.
What is the answer to this question?
If data is written to disk only when IndexWriter's close() is
called
Why not just use Ant to build Lucene?
Otis
--- srinivasa v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I got the lucene source files, When I started to compile all
packages again in some order, it is giving some error saying
some classnot foundthe order in which I compiled is given below.
You'd have to write parsers for each of those document types to convert
it to text and then index it.
Sure, you can feed it something like XML, but then you may consider
something like xmldb.org instead.
Otis
--- Antonio Vazquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a doubt. I know that
It looks like a person at Overture (former Goto.com) is using it.
I know ScreamingMedia.com used it at one point.
Otis
--- Jeff Kunkle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of any companies or agencies using Lucene for their
products/projects? I am attempting to make a marketing pitch
You need to download and install JavaCC.
Try this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lucene-userw=2r=1s=javaccq=b
Otis
--- Patrick Codere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
I just downloaded the latest version of Lucene, and not being to
familiar with java, I would like to get some
Yes, I would use this, especially the IndexReader methods that you
suggested.
Otis
--- Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You could try looking for a segments file in the index directory.
If it exists, the index exists, else it does
If I understand you correctly, you tried to search for '*new*'. I
believe you can't use an asterisk (*) as the first query of the query
term. So, new* is valid, while *new or *new* is not.
Otis
--- Serge A. Redchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello sampreet,
Tuesday, December 11, 2001,
Actually,
I do not think this is a bug.
You cannot make searches with queries that have only the NOT part.
You cannot ask Lucene to match all documents that do not contain a
certain term. For instance, issuing a 'NOT pretty' will not return
doc1, doc3, doc4.
You have to use that NOT pretty in
Hm, do you know which line in DateFilter.java this NPE comes from?
Could you try compiling Lucene with the -g switch so that we can see
the line numbers in the exception stack trace?
If you want you can also submit a bug report at
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
Thanks,
Otis
---
Hello,
--- Jan_Stövesand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to use a DateFilter without a query. I would like to
get all
Documents from within a certain period of time WITHOUT specifying any
query except the range of dates.
I don't know, but I'd like to know. Have you tried it?
Uh, I don't repeat myself, but I'll repeat others' words :)
It is the analyzer (StandardAnalyzer, I believe) that lowercases text
before indexing it.
If you use the same analyzer to search it will lowercase text before
performing a search, so you'll find the document with bo23 in it even
if you
Parag,
I'm not sure if I understood your question correctly, but it seems like
you want to create a Field that holds the path information (e.g.
TEST/subdir1 or TEST/subdir2, and so on), and then include that in the
query based on which path(s) you want to search.
You could use TEST to search
Hello,
You could write an XML parser (see http://xml.apache.org/ for some XML
tools) and store XML elements as Fields in Lucene Documents.
To search for 'Hello' and 'Hello Mr. President!' you can store the
whole article body as a Text (or maybe UnStored) Field.
You can also look on
Oui :)
Otis
--- Winton Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm getting stung by JVM 1.3.1_01 on Linux, max allocation of heap
is about 1.9 gb. Anyway, I'm thinking of going to 1.4 ? Anyone run
Lucene under this beta ?
Cheers,
Winton
--
Winton Davies
Lead
That file is created during the build process.
Try building Lucene by typing 'ant compile'.
Otis
--- Bizu_de_Anúncio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My brazilian steammer has the same structure as the German steammer,
except
for the inner logic.
I created it , tested it and now I'm
--- tal blum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm building a very large index, that contains several
categories.
I have several questions I hope you can answare.
1) Is there a way to use lucene with several indexes without merging
them?
Look at MultiSearcher class.
2) Does the Document id
?
Sorry, that might have been a wrong suggestion, IndexWriter (at least
the add method) is supposed to be thread safe.
Otis
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:07 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Index Locked
You could try playing with a merge factor...
Otis
--- Aruna Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there any ways to finetune the CPU performance with Lucene? I
know of
the usage of optimize() calls but I am wondering if there are any
other ways
to improve the CPU time/Disk space
Jonathan,
That's most likely caused by StandardAnalyzer, which you are probably
using. 'in' is listed as one of the stop words:
public static final String[] STOP_WORDS = {
a, and, are, as, at, be, but, by,
for, if, in, into, is, it,
no, not, of, on, or, s, such,
Actually, I think ASL doesn't require this, although it is nice when
even commercial entities give credit in some way.
I could be wrong about ASL.
Otis
--- Rafael Luque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know Lucene is a free project, however I think its use is under
Apache Software
Have you got the latest Lucene? Nightly build?
Try that, this looks like an old bug that has been fixed.
Otis
--- Charles Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are having some bizarre instances where SegmentTermPositions is
throwing
nullpointers. It only happens on certain queries, but it
Hello,
I think you should just try your two suggestions and see.
The answer depends on how exactly you do it, OS configuration, etc.
Does this happen on an optimized index, too?
Otis
--- Tihon One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all;
I've tried to index a 100K text file on a empty Index folder
Terry,
These are really not Lucene questions. Lucene will let you index text,
but you need to figure out how to parse your XHTML files.
Take a look at Jtidy on sf.net, I think Jtidy can help you with parsing
XHTML, or perhaps Xerces from xml.apache.org can.
Otis
--- Terry McGregor [EMAIL
Wouldn't that depend on how far from each other you wanted to allow
them to be? If you have a document with 100 words indexed and you are
searching for first second wouldn't you have to set the slop to about
100, just in case the word 'first' is the very first word in the
document, and 'second'
If you prefer the old way (multiple indices) you can do that with
Lucene, too. Look at MultiSearcher class.
Lucene also supports range queries which may be helpful. I haven't
used them, but it sounds like the thing to look at.
Otis
--- Paul Dlug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a relatively
Hm, I've got the latest Lucene (from CVS) and don't have this issue.
The query I tried on our index is:
+title:of +title:someotherwordthatDOESgetmeresults
Otis
--- Biswas, Goutam_Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Lucene Users
Lucene throws an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException() if the
Hello,
Do these 2 exceptions look familiar to anyone:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 111
at java.util.Vector.elementAt(Vector.java(Compiled Code))
at org.apache.lucene.index.FieldInfos.fieldInfo(FieldInfos.java:136)
at
No they don't. Note that delete() is in IndexReader.
Otis
--- Aruna Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do calls like optimize() and delete() on the Indexwriter cause a
separate
thread to be kicked off?
Thanks!
Aruna.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I don't think you are blind. You could get the latest source from the
CVS, or wait a few weeks when I hope we will get the new release out...
Otis
--- Shannon Booher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm just blind, but Lucene v1.02 does not appear to be
available
through
Just for the list/knowledge archive:
I found the source of one of the exceptions in my code:
java.io.IOException: Interrupted system call
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.seek(Native Method)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.FSInputStream.readInternal(FSDirectory.java:271)
at
I think there is no way to do that since a double quote is a special
character for query parser.
There was some discussion about introducing an escape character to
allow things like this, but the discussion has not materialized yet.
Otis
--- Tony Biag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way
I haven't heard of any such limit. There is a 'limit' of 10,000
characters on a field length, but that is a limit only because that
number is hard coded in the source.
However, shouldn't this be very simple for you to test?
Index something over and over and see if you ever hit the wall :)
Otis
This is becoming a FAQ...
Not by itself, so you have to write an application to collect the data
to be indexed yourself, and then feed it to Lucene.
Otis
--- Ryan Ogaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Lucene support the indexing/searching of multiple servers across
the network (file servers,
It depends on the Analyzer used.
Otis
--- Aruna Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does lucene replace all special characters with spaces when it adds
the
document to the index?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
This is answered in FAQA:
http://jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=538308
--- Aruna Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otis,
I am using StandardAnalyzer.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:37 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Parag,
Indexing time and index size should be proportional to the size of
documents being indexed. Also, I believe a document containing more
different, unique terms will result in a larger index size increase
than a document containing more duplicates. For instance I am going
to bed in a few
Hello,
This was a thread on lucene-user initially, but I'm copying lucene-dev
as well. Sorry about duplicates.
--- Stefan Bergstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just noticed this problem in my program.
It seems as if the analyzer passed to
Oh, I just thought of something (wine does body good).
Perhaps one could use Runtime (the class) to catch the JVM shutdown and
do whatever is needed to prevent index corruption. I believe there are
some shutdown hook methods in there that may let you do that. I'm too
lazy to look up the API
Hola,
I don't have year of search engine writing experience either, but I did
look at your reports on Sourceforge earlier and I will try to look at
the source to see if they are the right fixes. I haven't used
DateFilter, which, I think, you said contains the bug, so no promises,
but I'll look.
I'm using MultiTermQueryParser and it works for me.
Otis
--- Tate Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I am trying to search across multiple fields using the following
query
+keyword:computers +subject:News content:xml
or
+(keyword:{computers}) +(subject:{News}) content:xml
i have
The standard answer is try deleting/adding in batches instead of
individually. Seems more efficient, too, if you can write your
application that way.
That is what you are essentially doing by writing to a separate index
and then doing a bunch of deletions, followed by re-additions.
I know I'm
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmmm...really?
My impression was that the ANDs are treated equivalently with +s
by the
parser, so they're redundant.
Correct.
The { and }s aren't part of the syntax, are they?
I was wondering where those came from.
I don't think I've seen them
Maybe you can find something in Lucene's old repository on
Sourceforge.net.
Otis
--- Robert A. Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on Java 1.1.8, and can't upgrade beyond that for quite some time
due
to testing requirements.
I've managed to compile in and use the 1.2 StringBuffer class
Sorry, no experience with JDK 1.1.8 and Lucene nor JavaCC.
Sounds like a question for WebGain folks.
Otis
--- Robert A. Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm stuck on jdk 1.1.8 and can't upgrade for some time.
I'm using javacc to create some java code from a .jj file provided by
the
Lucene
Hello,
--- David Smiley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have reported bugs about Lucene in the fall of 2001 but no Lucene
developer has responded. I am sending this summary as a reminder.
My original message to the mailing list is here:
[Lucene-dev] More bugs
Hello,
SegmentTermEnum.clone(), term == null
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=451315group_id=3922;
atid=103922
Aha, this was a bug, indeed, but it looks like this bug has been fixed
about 6 months ago:
revision 1.2
date: 2001/10/11 15:14:14; author: scottganyo;
Hello,
Has anyone else observed this behaviour?
Wrong ordering from Document.fields()
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=451317group_id=3922;
atid=103922
It looks like java.util.Enumeration is used to store the fields, so if
Enumeration guarantees order than this should,
Aero*
Look at Wildcard and Prefix queries.
Otis
--- RAYMOND Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to do a query where I will find on a filed XX and
retrieved
the exact or partial matching fields ... for example a query on
aero
will return aeronef , aerosol, aero-finder
www.webgain.com
--- Robert A. Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't the webgain people on this mailing list? If not, how do I
contact
them? I've been looking around the javacc pages, but can only find
the
email address for this mailing list...
thanks,
rob
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Lucene-users,
has someone an answer to the following question:
If I add a StopFilter to my Analyzer, the stopwords I gave him will
be left
out the query. So far, so good. But when my query is like this one:
(field1
: x) AND (field2 : stopword) AND
I don't know enough about the query parser to be able to answer that
question, but why do you really need those parentheses?
It would also be great if you could submit this as a bug at
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/
Thanks,
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all, especially Otis
This means that you can make searches against that field, but cannot
retrieve its original value.
Otis
--- Robert A. Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should I use to store and add to my Document a long
String? (thousands of characters)
I'm still having difficulty understanding what it
Hello,
Nobody has contributed a tool that verified index integrity, yet.
Is this the latest version of Lucene?
Are you hitting the 2GB/file limit?
Just some ideas.
Otis
--- H S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
We are experiencing a problem with
index updates. We have a fairly
large
JavaCC 2.1 works, too.
This is how I have it set up:
[otis@linux2 otis]$ ls -al /usr/local/.version/javacc2.1/
total 44
drwxrwxr-x6 otis otis 4096 Jan 28 06:50 .
drwxr-xr-x 20 otis otis 4096 Apr 2 23:32 ..
drwxrwxr-x3 otis otis 4096 Jan 28 06:50 bin
If you want to store indices in a database search the mailing list
archives for SqlDirectory.
Once I considered using it for one application at work, so I asked its
author about performance. The answer was that it doesn't perform all
that well when the index grows, if I recall correctly.
name != pradeep == -name:pradeep
I think there is also support for the date query below, but I haven't
used it yet, so I don't want to give you any wrong information.
Otis
--- Pradeep Kumar K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi lucene friends!
Is there any way to create custom queries.
Just for
Ant you have Ant's optional.jar in Ant's lib directory?
--- David Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant returns following error.any ideas?
...
lucene-1.2-rc4-src/build.xml:92: Could not create task of type:
javacc.
Common solutions are to use taskdef to declare your task, or, if this
Hello,
I need to select an HTML parser for the application that I'm writing
and I'm not sure what to choose.
The HTML parser included with Lucene looks flimsy, JTidy looks like a
hack and an overkill, using classes written for Swing
(javax.swing.text.html.parser) seems wrong, and I haven't tried
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 10:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello,
I need to select an HTML parser for the application that I'm
writing
and I'm not sure what to choose.
The HTML parser included with Lucene looks flimsy, JTidy looks like
a
hack and an overkill
Hm, I just went through all the diffs after RC2 (QueryParser.jj
revision 1.3) and I can't see where '?' was dropped.
However, one user reported this on February 27th:
We just tried adding the ? character to QueryParser.jj under
#_TERM_START_CHAR. We noticed that the * was in that list, so we
19, 2002 1:38 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: HTML parser
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 10:28 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
:snip
Hi Otis,
I have an HTML parser built for ANTLR, but it's pretty strict in what
it
accepts. Not sure how useful it will be for you, but here
Did the change that you mentioned below really work for you?
I wrote this class:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=1638
and it looks like the bug is not in QueryParser, but in some Java class
(could it be WildcardTermEnum?), since the class does not make use of
Laura,
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lucene-userw=2r=1s=Spindleq=b
Oops, it's JoBo, not MoJo :)
http://www.matuschek.net/software/jobo/
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Otis,
thanks for your reply. I have been looking for Spindle and Mojo for 2
hours but I don't
Hello,
Get the latest version, try again, paste the error if you get it, and
use lucene-user list instead, more eyeballs and brains will see your
proble on that list.
Thanks,
Otis
--- Jacob Gutierrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there...
Using the latest version of StandardTokenizer.jj
Just curious, what exactly people need to do to 'fix up the
exceptions'? Editing of which files to change what to what?
I'd just like to document that somewhere, that's why I'm asking...
Otis
--- Robert A. Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got it working under Project Builder. You just have
Morning,
I'm starting to wander how bullet proof are Lucene indexes? Do they
get corrupted easely? If so is there a way to rebuild them?
There is no tool to detect index corruption, fixing of indexing, nor
index rebuilding.
The last one anyone can/has to do on their own.
I'm started to
Hello,
There is no tool to detect index corruption, fixing of indexing,
nor
index rebuilding.
The last one anyone can/has to do on their own.
:-( Well, that *very* sad to say the least... How do I know if my
indexes are not corrupted even if everything seems to be working
fine?
--- petite_abeille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what environment you're using Lucene in.
The problem seems to be specially bad on osx (10.1.4 + JRE 1.3.1 +
latest updates).
Does this mean you tried it on other OSs and it worked?
Which ones?
What JDK did those have and what was
Hello,
I'll put my comments inline...
--- petite_abeille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again,
attached is the source code of the only class interacting directly
with
Lucene in my app. Sorry for not providing a complete test case as
it's
hard for me to come up with something self
Hello,
and what was their ulimit and what is the
ulimit on your OSX machine?
Just curious.
I don't know. Does it matter?
Of course it does - a low (u)limit is a part of your problem, perhaps.
Otis
P.S.
I don't know how Winblows deals with file descriptors. Try your
application on
Hello,
--- Joel Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At my company we trying to decide on a new search engine.
I am very impressed with what I see with Lucene and am thinking very
seriously of not going with AltaVista, FAST etc...
:)
One of things that is very important to us is sorting by
Hm, this should be a FAQ.
Maybe it should... ;-)
It is now.
Check Lucene contributions page, there are some starting points
there,
Well, this seems to be a very popular request... In fact I need
something like that also. Unfortunately, there seems to be no
authoritative answer as
Caching?
The OSes usually cache recently opened files...
Otis
--- a person [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know exactlty why when searching for a term the engine is
much slower on the first search of a term, than on subsequent searchs
of the same term?
Thanks
Join 18 million
Uh, this is a very broad question.
A number of things could be wrong.
Look at your Tomcat log files.
Write a class that you can run from the command line, not as a servlet,
that may be easier to debug. You can use one of the demo ones to get
started.
Log things, don't catch exceptions and ignore
You could have a single index with both stemmed and non-stemmed terms,
using different field names for each and searching a different set of
fields depending on the type of search.
You'd also have to use 2 types of analyzers/filters, I think.
Roughly :)
Otis
--- Joel Bernstein [EMAIL
I don't think there are any on the market.
A perfect opportunity for somebody :)
Otis
--- William W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Do you know some book about Lucene ?
Thanks,
William.
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to
Hello,
The host that you are trying to crawl cannot be looked up:
bash-2.04$ nslookup www.violet-arcana.com
Server: localhost.apache.org
Address: 127.0.0.1
*** localhost.apache.org can't find www.violet-arcana.com: Non-existent
host/domain
This is not a Lucene issue, but more of a
Yes, me too. I just tried it on some Lucene index (the search at
blink.com) and it doesn't seem to work (try searching for travel and
then *vel).
I'm assuming the original poster confused something...
Otis
--- Joel Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought Lucene didn't support left
Hello,
I believe that is not possible with Lucene.
Although there is something called a RangeQuery, which may be helpful.
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/RangeQuery.html
Otis
--- Victor Hadianto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use lucene to search greater
The source code looks like this:
public final synchronized void addIndexes(Directory[] dirs)
throws IOException {
optimize(); // start with zero or
1 seg
for (int i = 0; i dirs.length; i++) {
SegmentInfos sis = new SegmentInfos(); //
Hello,
A query for india should not be returning southindia (one word).
It sounds like something else is happening in your application.
Otis
--- Harpreet S Walia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are using lucene to index and search unicode(utf-8) contents in
devnagari(hindi) language .
I believe what you are referring to is on Lucene's TODO list, possibly
for the next release.
One or two people have already contributed some code for Lucene on
read-only media such as CD-ROM, so you may want to check the mailing
list archives for the code if this is urgent for you.
Otis
---
Dobro jutro,
Dario, maybe this answers your question:
http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=538312
Otis
--- Dario Novakovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i index/search with anlyzer which converts all characters to
lowercase. it
works corectly until i use *, then i must use query strings with
Dario,
Yes, we may improve coding style over time, but there are no plans for
doing that in the immediate future. I know, it's not ideal, so we all
have to get used to those few exceptions.
Otis
--- Dario Novakovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i noticed that some method names in lucene start
arguments to choose lucene compared
to the
swish-e solution ?
functionnal differences ?
scalability ?
performances ?
is there any benchamrks somewhere ?
thanks
roland
-Message d'origine-
De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : mercredi 5 juin 2002 00:23
As far as I know there is no generic way to do that.
You can parse the String in your application, form Fields, add them to
a Document, and there you go, but there is nothing generic. Besides
field names and values, your String would also have to contain meta
data about each field, whether it is
David,
As far as I can tell the '?' character works as it should with
WildcardQuery. See
src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/TestWildcard.java.
The tests there use SimpleAnalyzer and WildcardQuery directly (i.e. not
QueryParser). All tests pass. Try comparing your code with the code
in the
Hello,
That was the problem , Thanks :-) . still i am strugling to get
lucene to
search non english unicode content . it works partially will simple
analyser
but doesn't return any results with standard analyser . is there a
way by
which i can output the exact contents that are going into
Hello,
I'm sending this to lucene-user list, as that seems more appropriate.
I haven't used Lucene's slop feature, but it looks like both
QueryParser and PhraseQuery have support for slop. I am not sure what
the syntax for it is, but if nothign else you should be able to call
setSlop(int)
--- Harpreet S Walia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there any resources available which explain how the simple
analyser processes the data given to it .
what i want to know is that suppose i have a set of words , what
exact rules are applied to tokenize and index these words and how
James,
I haven't used RangeQueries, but what you describe does sound confusing
to me. I'll enter it as a bug, just so this information doesn't get
lost, because I am not certain that this is really a bug, even though
it sounds like one to me.
Thanks,
Otis
--- James Ricci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hm, this sounds an awful lot like a FAQ, yet I don't see it in Lucene's
FAQ at jGuru.com.
You need to close and reopen the index(reader) if you want to see the
latest changes.
There is a method that you can use to figure out if the index has been
modified since you opened it.
Otis
--- James
saved off
the open time). Is there something a little more direct?
James
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Are IndexReader objects always up to date?
Hm, this sounds
Thanks for this table. It's part of the Lucene FAQ at jGuru now:
http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=910778
Otis
--- Mark Harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to understand the multithreaded behaviour of Lucene
too.
I have a test rig and the observed results are
Yes, there are a few things one can do. See
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgId=117057
Otis
--- James Ricci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been doing a few tests, and I'm finding creating an index in
Lucene to
be somewhat slower than other engines I've worked
cannot happen concurrently, yet there's a Y in that box on the
matrix. Also, /shouldn't/ the matrix be symmetric? It isn't. If it
is intended to me, I think only half of the matrix should be there as
to not be confusing.
~ Dave Smiley
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 10:12 PM, Otis
I don't know about Resin, but Tomcat allows one to set CATALINA_OPTS
(or some other _OPTS) environment variable, whose value is them used to
invoke Java. I would imagine Resin to have something similar.
This then becomes a Resin question.
Otis
--- Nader S. Henein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Hello,
First of all, the machine from which you sent this email has the date
set incorrectly - it thinks it's 22. 6. 2000.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had searched the archive of this list for getting more info on How
to delete a document from the lucene index.
But most of the postings
Check the Hits class API:
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/search/Hits.html
Otis
--- Chris Sibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know how to retrieve a stored document from an index by it's
document number ? I have a list of search hits, and when the user
clicks
I don't think Lucene contains anything to help you create this pool.
However, if you look at Jakarta Commons project you will find a
subproject there that allows you to create pools of any kind of Java
object. You can probably use that to save yourself development and
debug time.
Otis
---
1 - 100 of 718 matches
Mail list logo
